Our AI-generated future is going to be fantastic.

Archive link, so you don’t have to visit Substack: https://archive.is/hJIWk

  • 0xtero@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah sorry - edited OP and added archive link, so no one needs to hit substack servers.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pardon my ignorance but I’m OOTL- why is substack a bad thing? ( I didn’t know of its existence before this post)

      • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 year ago

        They recently refused to remove pro-Nazi content from their site, claiming that doing so doesn’t make the problem go away so therefore there’s no point in trying.

        • tjhart85@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          For me, it’s the refusal to demontize them that’s particularly bad. I can understand free speech absolutists (in theory anyways, in practice you’ll find that they VERY rarely actually are and will happily censor people they disagree with like LGBTQIA+ or sex work content), but that doesn’t mean you need to actively be funding them!

          • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            This is a really good point. I’m sure they’re using a payment provider, so it might be worth it to go to them directly in the same way people have gone to advertisers to get Fox News hosts fired. The argument could be made that they’re funding domestic terrorism by white nationalists. The payment provider might be much less willing to take on that risk in the name of “free speech”.