ā€œGlaringly obviousā€ incompetence on display as judge tells jury to ā€œdisregard everything Ms. Habba just saidā€

Trump lawyer Alina Habba struggled through her cross-examination of E. Jean Carroll on Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is overseeing the defamation case against the former president, repeatedly admonished the attorney for running afoul of his court rules and general procedures.

Prior to Carrollā€™s testimony, Habba requested an adjournment so that Trump could attend his mother-in-lawā€™s funeral.

ā€œThe application is denied. I will hear no further argument on it. None. Do you understand that word? None. Please sit down,ā€ Kaplan, a Bill Clinton appointee, told Habba about the motion that he already denied.

Kaplan repeatedly interrupted Habbaā€™s questions, including when she began to read from a document that had not been formally entered into evidence, sending the trial to a recess.

  • Thrashy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    Ā·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is a pretty good indicator of the quality of her legal guidance, in that sheā€™s halfway to a valid form of objection, but seems to have forgotten the other half of it. You are allowed to object to evidence or testimony that is more prejudicial (i.e. ā€œthe defendant was seen kicking puppies at the dog park on a weekly basisā€) than it is probative, meaning that ts useful in proving or disproving the allegations (the case was actually about a bank robbery not involving puppies at all). You canā€™t just cry ā€œprejudiced!ā€ and expect the judge to go along with you.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      11 months ago

      Trumpā€™s team also did themselves no favors by objecting out of turn, especially after he explicitly ordered ā€œone witness, one lawyerā€ during a recess.