• MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        We watched him collude with Russia on national TV with our own eyes. Whatever links you have will never undo that.

      • Digital_Prophet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Lol “Id like to push back by linking two youtube videos, one from the hill and the other from RNN.”

        We only accept infowars and parler links as legitimate sources, sorry!

        edit: And pornhub links!

        • ElleChaise@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          The weird thing here is that when you run these sources through one of those media bias websites, TRNN says ‘far left bias’, and The Hill says ‘slight left bias’. Are these bias sites blind; or am I just missing what having a ‘left bias’ means? Is there some far-left plan by whatever think tank to make me want to support this idea, which I very much do not support? An idea which usually falls under the ‘extreme right-wing’ category, no less? What the hell?

          • nublug@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            11 months ago

            that’s the ‘crypto’ part. hidden. they pretend to be leftist yet always attack leftists and never corporate or right wing. disinformation artists and grifters.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            That other person with the links likes to listen to weird conspiracy theories, particularly Jimmy Dore. Check the communities they moderate. I wouldn’t put too much thought into what they post and comment, tbh.

            And they always act like they’re so enlightened and unfased when they get called out, it’s kind of eerie.

        • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          35
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not sure what you are on about…

          This is the internet, once in a while you may run into subjects you don’t agree with.

          Many well-known and respected independent journalists have discussed this subject at length.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            What I’m saying is, he continues to have a vested interest in disproving Russiagate. I’d be more interested in hearing what someone completely disconnected from Russia has to say about it.

            • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ah, okay.

              Only a few are that ou spoken, and they all get labeled far-right or russian asset.

              Same as the whistleblowers, which are human with bias in them.

      • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Pure garbage that undoubtedly references each other as “proof”.
        45, and a large portion of the Republican conference is in pootie’s pocket.