• 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    It is a little bit of a contradiction and I had a hard time following the logic. But your post made me think of something else. If you have one extremist candidate by definition you have two, because from the perspective of the followers of the atypical extremist candidate (a trump like figure) status quo will be an extreme for them

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Extremism needs to be judged by the standards of that party in this context. An extreme Democrat is either a radical socialist like Bernie Sanders, or utterly non-progressive like Biden. Likewise extremist for the GOP would be a fascist like Trump, or someone so far left as to almost qualify as a progressive.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can’t help but notice that you couldn’t come up with leftist GOP extremist.

        I think you were able to do it with Democrats was because Democrats are really everyone else who doesn’t identify themselves as Republicans. With the first past the post, those different parties have no option but to work together as one.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I couldn’t list the left of the GOP because I don’t honestly follow the GOP besides the nearly daily disgust at the things they do. There has to be a far left for the GOP, I’m just not sure who that is (probably because they aren’t making the headlines, just quietly doing what they can to hold back the rest of the monsters in their party). Whose the least offensive Republican you can think of? That’s probably the far left for them.