The EU Court ruled that “Backdoors may also be exploited by criminal networks and would seriously compromise the security of all users’ electronic communications. The Court takes note of the dangers of restricting encryption described by many experts in the field.” Any requirement to build in backdoors to encryption protocols for law enforcement agencies could also be taken advantage of by malicious actors.

The EU Court of Human Rights’ also builds on their acknowledgment that “mass surveillance does not appear to have contributed to the prevention of terrorist attacks, contrary to earlier assertions made by senior intelligence officials.”

As the EU Commision’s Chat Control Bill directly targets undermining secure end-to-end encryption, it now looks to be in trouble. In its current version, the Chat Control bill would require the scanning of content on your personal devices, including that which is sent via end-to-end encrypted messenger apps or encrypted email. At some point, providers would be required to either break this encryption to allow the scanning of content or scan content once it has been decrypted and is readable.

On February 13th, Europe received an early Valentine’s gift from the European Court of Human rights when they banned any laws that aims to weaken end-to-end encryption. This ruling is a major stumbling block for the EU Chat Control Bill, but does it really mean that Chat Control is dead? There are many reasons why Chat Control should never become law, we’ve collected the turn of events and steps you can take to help prevent this dangerous bill from ever being passed!

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Good question, it absolutely should, since they say secret backdoors compromise security for ALL users.
    Unfortunately many governments seem to think it’s OK for secret services to break the law, and work beyond grey areas. I personally believe they should operate within the law, but for some reason most people seem to think that’s an unsustainable model. ???

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        The NSA did not alert Microsoft about the vulnerabilities, and held on to it for more than five years before the breach forced its hand.

        An organization formed for national security doesn’t give a shit about software vulnerability that can threaten national security.
        It’s as I’ve been saying for a long time, most of these secret agencies are rotten at the core.
        Once I thought we were better (Denmark). But Snowden showed we are not, they even threatened to prosecute a defense minister on national security charges, for mentioning things Snowden had already revealed. This was police and defense intelligence backed by administration of the government.
        And Denmark is supposed to be one of the least corrupt countries in the world!!