• Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    To quote Software Freedom Conservancy:

    For approximately twenty years, Red Hat (now a fully owned subsidiary of IBM) has experimented with building a business model for operating system deployment and distribution that looks, feels, and acts like a proprietary one, but nonetheless complies with the GPL and other standard copyleft terms.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      To quote both of you “nevertheless complies with the GPL and other standard copyleft terms”.

      Were you trying to prove his point?

      • med@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        As shocking as this might be, I think he’s agreeing, and offering supplimentary proof

      • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Obviously they comply with the GPL, otherwise they would get sued. But Red Hat acts exactly like a proprietary software company. That’s what the quote is trying to say.