10 Reasons You Should Switch From Chrome to Firefox.::The best browser sync out there.

  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    289
    ·
    10 months ago

    11: It’s the only browser on the market that is not either apple webkit or google chrome based. And it’s in our best interest to keep said market healthy, with as many competing actors as possible.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      At some point there were more than 1 relevant browsers using Gecko, though. Somebody at Mozilla decided to gloriously triumph over allies by killing XULRunner and not offering a replacement.

      Not sure if WebKit is such a bad choice in that context.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The Tor browser is still Firefox based. Not a large niche, but being THE preferred way to browse with Tor makes it on its own imho

          • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            As it should be. But honestly unless there needs to be a change there is no reason to fork.

            Most of the chromium forks are just branding and proprietary features they want built in, with brave being the only one that feels a little more aggressive in changes from the base.

            • goldsoul@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Tbf someone else mentioned arc browser which is chromium and seems to be pretty…different from base

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Well, there are also the mobile variants of Firefox, which are more of their own thing.

        IMO Mozilla limited itself a bit too much on Firefox. Which results it their web engine not attracting many developers for it outside Mozilla.

        Embedding gecko in your own app was much easier in the past. This is now mostly taken over by CEF and WPE for Blink and WebKit respectively.

        Also stuff like B2G (Boot 2 Gecko) or FirefoxOS are dead as well.

        A goal of open source should be to be hacker friendly as well, were currently Blink/WebKit is leading. There are so many more projects around those engines than Gecko, which is sad.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, I’m talking about that. I was using conkeror (Gecko-based browser with emacs-like controls, which is funny since for editing I’ve never learned emacs and use vi/vim) until it stopped being practical.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It really is telling that even Microsoft don’t find it viable to maintain a browser engine.

      The “standards” are an absolute fucking nonsense, and boil down to “just do what Chrome does because nobody can stop them”.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        To be fair to Chrome.

        Microsoft had the vast majority with Trident. Mozilla/Firefox slowly gained market share with Gecko. Chrome/Webkit* then took market share from both.

        It’s not like Chrome just appeared one day and demanded everyone use them, they gained market share by being a good browser.

        *(Chrome now uses a fork of Webkit called Blink.)

        That being said I do think Firefox provides the best browser experience, and Chrome users should look into switching.

        Which is a long way of saying Microsoft fucked up bad. Real bad.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Microsoft is the king of blowing a massive, industry-defining market lead in the fourth quarter due to unforced errors. Especially in the 21st century:

          • They were the default office suite, to the point where their trademark became the category name, and they even had SharePoint; but their stubborn refusal to get into the cloud document game handed off the top spot to Google Docs.

          • They were the king of K12 education by default, since Apple was so expensive and essentially the only factor that matters in K12 is price. Then they completely ignored Google offering really good deals on Chromebooks for a decade or more, and now Chrome OS is the dominant K12 platform.

          • They owned Skype, which was genericized as the popular verb meaning “to make a video call.” But they ignored the opportunity that was the pandemic, and Zoom not only ate their lunch but took the genericized trademark crown.

          • They had Lync, which was the de facto messaging app that every Enterprise deployment used. But then they didn’t update the app for a decade except to change the name to Skype for Business and then to Teams, while Slack ate their lunch.

          • And, as you mentioned, they had the top browser for both users and developers, but did nothing with it until Chrome got unattainably faster, easier to use, and more standards-compliant.

          • Xbox was never the singular market leader like these other things—they’ve always played ping-pong with PlayStation—but Microsoft owns Rare, an industry defining studio, and they’ve completely wasted them for years.

          • They never had dominance in the smartphone world, but they were poised for it with a well-liked and visually distinct platform in Windows Phone which they just abandoned.

          • To a certain extent, they had a sort of “goodwill dominance” in their operating system, which they frittered away on automatic updates and design overhauls and (more recently) AI that nobody was asking for.

          They lost all these massive leads while they were chasing dominance in search, or video game livestreaming, or AI, or whatever. They always seem to be focusing on the thing that doesn’t matter while their dominance just flutters away in the wind.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s in their DNA. They completely missed the internet boat when it first took off in the early 2000s and played catch-up for years thereafter. You would think they would have learned and not made the same mistakes again that you have in your list, but nope. Maybe they were too busy fighting Linux.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I feel like I’m going crazy since we kept preaching for years that this is the end goal and that this is what will happen with Google’s anti-competitive practices. Just get shit on in the comment threads until recently.

        It’s not even a feel good I told you so because this just sucks.

      • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sigh. Every fucking thread.

        This is not true. Firefox is not the only browser that’s not based on Webkit.

        There’s Iceweasel, Waterfox, Pale Moon, Seamonkey and Librewolf. That they have a negligible portion of the market is one thing. But they’re on the market, dammit!

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve heard this over and over…

      But people still aren’t getting it (despite increasingly obvious signs this is already causing problems that will soon get much worse), so I guess we need to keep saying it

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I definitely get less sneers these days when I talk about things like this

          Hell, you know what - I’m going to double down on your bright side - if the enshitification wasn’t so public and rapid, it might’ve been too late before normal people started noticing

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I just had to install chrome to book plane tickets. Kept getting an error on Firefox.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s a new feature inside Firefox that allows you to report webpages that are broken on Firefox but work in other browsers. Please use it. It’s a great way to push for universal compatibility within browsers. It’s usually the webpage developer’s fault for using a non-orthodox technique that works exclusively on Chrome, but shouldn’t be done for any sort of reasons, like compliance with web standards. But, it’s possible for Firefox to derive intelligence from the reports and write workarounds.

        • M500@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          When I was choosing a return site it kept saying, “oops there was a mistake. It was not your fault. Try again later”.

          Their mobile app sucked too, so I installed chrome to see if it would work and it did right away.

          • GregorTacTac@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            If websites don’t work on Firefox even if the user agent was changed to Chrome I recommend you to use a privacy preserving browser like ungoogled chromium.

              • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                It’s a string that your browser sends to websites with information about the browser itself and your OS. Sometimes that info will be used to block functionality.

                Years ago I tried to use TurboTax from Firefox on Ubuntu. It wouldn’t work because only Internet Explorer on Windows was supported. I changed the user agent to make it appear as though I was using a supported setup, and it worked flawlessly.

                I haven’t actually needed to use one in a long time, but an extension search for “user agent switcher” should turn up something that can do it.

              • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                Easiest would be to install a plugin such as “User-Agent Switcher.” This is the string of text that identifies what browser, version, and platform you’re running to the server you’re accessing.

            • M500@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Thanks! I just downloaded chrome to use for this one off instance. I’m pretty degoogled, but needed to book a flight so I just needed to get it done.

    • Aermis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hi. I’m on lemmy. I haven’t switched. Why? Because there an insane amount of incorporation into Google. Email, my phone communicating to pc, passwords, auto fill, saved cookies, credit cards.

      I want to switch. I want to get off chrome from what I’ve been reading regarding it’s practices. But I’m so engraved and the undertaking of switching is not something I’ve committed to yet. Or might never. I already have a Google Home in my kitchen. I feel like privacy isn’t something I have a privilege of anymore.

      They’ve got me.

          • Jojo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Honestly for me it has much better synching. It took a little work to move everything over, but far less than I anticipated.

          • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            My Firefox experience is seamless between my work station, laptop and Android phone. Syncing happens immediately when I open my session on either of them. I don’t use the Google ecosystem much though (I mean Google pay, etc) so transitioning may be harder than I imagine from where I sit

            • Aermis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Man I don’t really use anything Google except my Gmail when logging into misc accounts

          • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh man! Download KeePassXC, put your passwords on there, install the browser extension to use it in your browsers. You can back it up any way you want, including using Google Drive because the file is encrypted.

              • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Some people don’t want to sign up to a cloud provider or manage their own instance. KeePassXC offers a simple file that can be stored on your devices. It’s easy to sync using your existing cloud accounts and encrypted.

                • PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The overlap of the community that don’t want to sign up to cloud providers and those that save their passwords to chrome is a very small overlap.

                  Poco a poco, little by little. Jumping into the deepend is not for everyone

  • ensignrolaren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There’s like… no downside: all upside.

    Edit: I exaggerated, of course. Below this are some downsides that individuals have experienced. But personally, my experience using Firefox on desktop for Mac has been all upside. If everybody who can just tries it out, you might be surprised at how friction-free the change is.

    • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not strictly true. Firefox gets inferior support from cloud services, like Microsoft. Newer versions of their Web apps are not available on Firefox.

      But there should be no downside. It’s all artificial.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        The big services purposely degrade their sites when users connect with Firefox. It’s well documented.

        Unfortunately nothing is being done about it so far.

    • sonovebitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      One thing I miss in Firefox is tab grouping. Yes there are 3rd party extensions that do that. But Chromium based browsers support that natively.

          • candyman337@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Agreed, and it seems like Firefox has recently made an effort to accommodate the extension more, as it seems to run even better than it used to and is now a recommended extension

        • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You haven’t tried Vivaldi then. It has the best tab management features of any browser by leaps and bounds, it saddens me they chose Chromium over Gecko given that manifest v3 is coming.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh hell yeah… Thank you friend. I immediately downloaded it, and it took me all of 30 seconds to realize this is it

          This is what I’ve been looking for, for years now. I even took a crack at it myself several years ago, but then I realized it wasn’t possible without doing an extension (rather than a plug-in) if I wanted to do it right

          You have mitigated one of most inconvenient recurring problems in my life. I’m working on a lemmy app right now, and I’m so grateful I’m going to move up the “mark user as friend” feature.

          How would you like me to guild your username so I might recognize you in the future? Lit up border? Tiny crown on your avatar? A little lemmy gold symbol next to the score? I’m open to suggestion

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It gives me anxiety, it’s way too overcrowded and cluttered. I use Tree Style Tab. It does one thing, it does it well, it doesn’t overcomplicate it, it works with me.

          • candyman337@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I will say it took me some time to get used to it, but it also is a lot easier to use than it used to, they made a lot of things better in the last update

            I think it’s one of those things that you have to sit down and test out and really figure out. Tree style tabs are also good though. I definitely think it’s where sideberry got their inspiration

    • aluminium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No, in my experience especially the Android version of Firefox is less smooth when playing animations or scrolling on older or lower end devices.

      I really hope with the new Focus on Firefox mobile, that they will iron that out.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have to use Chrome for…

      1. Logging into PSN, since something in Firefox hard locks when I try it. I think it’s to do with Firefox’s password manager.

      2. VR porn.

      3. Some videos. Firefox doesn’t support certain video types (namely HEVC/H.265) due to patent issues.

  • Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I feel like anyone on Lemmy who isnt yet using Firefox is the kind of person who isnt going switch now because an article told them they should

    edit: it seems I had a stroke (not seriously) while writing this message, and have since edited it so it makes sense

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I prefer Fennec, Mull is too restrictive. I get the appeal, but I want some of the comforts.

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          My biggest pet peeve is the system color scheme detection. Mull always runs websites in white.

          • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Ah. That’s part of Resist Fingerprinting mode, which (after checking about:config) I see Mull enables by default. Desktop Firefox does the same thing in that mode. You could always turn it off if you don’t value that protection.

  • MSids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wish the password autofill feature was more robust for Firefox on Android. Using it as my default password provider but it regularly does not pick up on password fields.

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      10 months ago

      Dunno if this helps you at all, but I’ve been using BitWarden to manage my passwords since I made the switch from Chrome to Firefox (both on PC and my Android phone). It doesn’t fill passwords automatically in either case, but it’s not much extra work to invoke BitWarden to fill those fields as-needed on either device, and it works very consistently. It’s also (I’m told) much more secure. Just thought I’d share that here!

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve had this happen with obscure government sites that look like they were made in the 90s, I manually add the login & password for these

  • sherlockholmez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    TAB GROUPS, FIREFOX, BRING BACK TAB GROUPS.

    And no, extensions aren’t helping, their UX is so much worse.

    That’s just a make or break feature for me.

    • jh34ghu43gu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      So I tried to find what tab groups are but most of the results are feature request threads so apologies if this isn’t what you want.

      Waterfox will soon be adding some sort of tab grouping feature akin to what tree-style-tab extension does. Here’s the blogpost about it https://www.waterfox.net/blog/waterfox-x-treestyletab/

      Again I’m not sure if that type of grouping is what you’re looking for but if it is consider watching out for the feature release. Longtime waterfox user and haven’t had many complaints, Alex has quickly responded to the two issues I made in the github including a feature request that got added within a week (ability to unload tabs with right click).

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          When I right click on a tab in Firefox, I can reopen it in a container. The containers (at first glance) seem to be limited to Personal, Work, Banking, Shopping, and Facebook (which is probably there because I have Facebook container installed). In settings I can modify the container tabs available. (And turn the feature on or off, but it’s already on because of Facebook container.)

          Is that what that is? It looks a lot like the example you linked. Firefox 123.0, but it’s been there for quite a while.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not really, though the functionalities are adjacent and I could see how one would make that mistake. I do indeed use container tabs, and they’re a killer feature.

            Tab groups are merely organizational, allowing you to reference, store, close, and save groups of tabs en masse; by contrast, container tabs don’t do ANY organization at all; you can’t group them all together, move them all to a new window as one, bookmark them all, close them all, etc.

            • limelight79@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Interesting, thanks. Seems like the containers could be expanded into the tab group functionality without too much trouble.

              • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                True, and I would love the ability to link them, but I think having them linked by default would be confusing to users who don’t need containerization. “Wait, I already logged in to that!”

    • DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Switched away to Vivaldi and Opera on desktop years ago due to better design and ability to swap between workspaces. Trying to migrate back to Firefox for ethical reasons. Desktop design still lags behind but privacy is great.

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Years ago Firefox had a massive memory leak that would wind up crashing FX randomly or just crushing your system resources. The bug persisted for years. and I swirched to Chrome to get away from that poor experience. A few years back, a random community contributer, that was also fed up, dug in and fixed several issues responsible for the leaks. I remeber thinking that I should give FX a go again, but didn’t until relatively recently.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Firefox on Android is fine, except they insist upon disabling about:config on the main branch of the browser for some damn stupid reason. You have to use a nightly or beta build to be trusted with your own config that much.

      Personally, I ended up switching to the Fennec fork over this.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah, it’s alright.

      You can install an ad blocker in it, so it’s automatically better than Chrome.

      With that and a few cookie popup removers, it’s almost like the web is usable again.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Firefox on Android is great. I migrated that first before I actually migrated back to Firefox on desktop.

    • Maniac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Using use daily. Only problem I sometimes have is the inability to upload images, so I just use duckduckgo’s browser

    • Mark@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its ok but I regularly have to swipe the app away and re open it when it displays a blano screen instead of the website.

    • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes. It used to suck, say, 10 years ago. My baseline was Youtube and Reddit (back then, okay?) Could I watch Youtube videos the same way as with Chrome or Android browser? No? Then, not ready. Did i.reddit.com open fine? No? Not ready.

      Then it happened. And I switched and it has been wonderful ever since.

      The only thing that I miss is the “pull down page to reload” gesture [EDIT: THANK YOU ALL! I’VE ENABLED IT - GREAT!!!]. Not sure why Firefox hasn’t implemented that yet. Patents? And also, when a video is in an iframe, it won’t respect the “block autoplay” feature. The rest is dandy.

    • RunAroundDesertYou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      For me it is great on a smartphone but pretty underwhelming on my android tablet. It doesn’t scale websites properly on the larger screen and doesn’t support a tab list on top anymore (like Firefox on desktops).

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s great but they are two, reported, bugs that annoy me.

      First, it sometimes gets stuck half way between dark and light mode.

      Second, sometimes it gets stuck starting to load a page. The webciew gets stuck but not the chrome. If you switch tabs the same page will appear. If you enter a new page it will never load. A force close fixes it but it’s annoying.

      Using beta is imperative since it enables add-ons . However the bugs are also in stable.

    • Delusion6903@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is my default. I use ublock and Dark Background Light Text extensions. And the reader view is better than any chromium phone browser.

    • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Works mostly great. Addons like uBlock Origin and Super Agent (auto reject all cookies) is great for your mobile experience.

      I noticed Youtube site sometimes has weird framerates. But since Google removed premium lite subscription, I refuse to use the Youtube app and just view with uBlock in browser, even with the framerate issues.

    • DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I recently made the switch. Make sure to install whatever add-ons you need, turn on the “open links in apps” setting, and turn on the “pull to refresh” setting. Import your bookmarks and you can still use the Android password manager. It’s not 100% as smooth, but it’s pretty close.

      • DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The main problems I have with it now are sometimes there are still issues with loading between browser and apps. Like it might open multiple tabs trying to open an app, and it leaves the app redirect pages open in your tabs list. Additionally, sometimes (like 3% of the time) website scaling doesn’t always work, especially on older sites or those made with janky CMS’s, and I’ve also rarely had problems with some dynamic content like inline forms and graphs.

    • Sheldan@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I am, sometimes there is an issue with videos in Fullscreen, where the video plays just somewhere to the top and off screen, besides that it’s fine.

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    10 reasons:

    1. I always used Firefox
    2. I always used Firefox
    3. I always used Firefox
    4. I always used Firefox
    5. I always used Firefox
    6. I always used Firefox
    7. I always used Firefox
    8. I always used Firefox
    9. I always used Firefox
    10. Google can suck my saggy man tits
  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Anybody else having flaky behavior with youtube videos in Firefox lately? Like, only audio resuming but video freezing after rewinding? I’m wondering if this is intentional on the part of Google.

  • phreekno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Firefox Multiaccount Containers, the thing that can’t be beat by even the best chrome derivatives