At least one of Trumpā€™s four criminal trials is set to begin while the others are now in jeopardy

After five decades of playing fast and loose with the laws of New York, and a plenary of fraud, deception and corruption, legal appeasement seems to be declining and legal accountability seems to be ramping up as the proverbial hens are finally returning home to roost for the former Houdini of white-collar crime, Donald J. Trump.

First, there was the civil judgment of 5 million dollars awarded to the writer E. Jean Carroll by a federal jury of Trumpā€™s peers. Then there was a second judgment of $83.3 million in damages awarded to Carroll by another jury of Trumpā€™s peers for the additional defamatory statements that he continued to make after the first judgment was rendered for denying that he had sexually assaulted Carroll. And then there was the New York civil fraud decision by Judge Arthur Engoron holding Trump and his sons, Eric and Don, Jr. financially liable to the tune of more than $350 million underscoring ā€œthe extent of Trump and the Trump Organizationā€™s white-collar malfeasance.ā€ Last week, Judge Engoron turned down a request by Trumpā€™s lawyers to postpone payment.

However, in the case of the historic $454 million judgment, ā€œa figure that is growing by more than $100,000 in interest every day,ā€ Trump sought a stay yesterday in opposition to New York law that requires first forking over the entire amount in damages or putting up a cash bond for the same known in the New York civil court system as an ā€œundertaking.ā€

Trump also had previously done the same thing with the $83.3 million ruling by a jury in the second E. Jean Carroll defamation lawsuit. Neither of these appeals should go anywhere and the clock is still ticking in each case and soon time will be up before Carrollā€™s attorneys and then the New York attorney general Letitia James can start seizing the former presidentā€™s assets and property.

  • OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    People said conceptually the same thing before he was elected the first time. The pictures of him besides Epstein, the accusations including one by a then-14-year-old girl that he raped her (she was in that photo too, or or at least others at the same party by Epstein), his own rather damning words seeming to support such actions, the fact that he rarely pays his workers, ALL the MANY court casesā€¦ weā€™ve seen ALL of this before.

    And this time is different. The last time, they voted more for not-Hillary, but this time, many people want to vote specifically for him!? Donā€™t underestimate the number of those who voted for Bernie Sanders in the primary but who then flipped to vote for Trump in the general election. Will this repeat now, for people upset at Bidenā€™s treatment of Israel, or how bad the economy is right now (despite the laws that Republicans passed making it this way, plus genocidally inept handling of the pandemic scenario)? Yes, plus also those who would vote Republican regardless, plus ALSO those who would have voted for Trump personally even if he had run as an independent.

    So what if they start taking his properties away? That would simply drive him to spend MORE rather than less time on the campaign trail?

    I strongly question this conclusion, especially from a site that just wants people to click so theyā€™ll say whatever they can to get that to happen. Best for what purpose - him losing the upcoming election? Well, just like the last time, weā€™ll see.