• AbsentBird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    💯 the new Dune movies could be considered a reboot, but they’re light years better than the 80s movie, which was widely considered a disappointment by fans of the books and a financial failure.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m seeing a resurgence of people liking the '80s version, but it’s mostly because of the camp, but also because it’s more accurate to the book, until the end. The miniseries is honestly possibly the best version, though most people don’t know it exists. The new one is by far the most interesting, and it sounds and looks nearly perfect.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The 80s movie is absolutely not more accurate to the book. Duncan Idaho gets shot with a gun, the Fremen had sonic blasters made from ‘killing words’, the Harkonnen had heart plugs, the ornithopters didn’t even have wings. I could go on and on, it went way off text.

        The latest movies are much closer to the books, the few changes make total sense for the format of cinema, they don’t radically change the tone or mechanics of the setting.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It follows the events better I guess is what I should say. The new one cuts a lot more of it out and adds a lot more that wasn’t there. The tone of the old one is totally wrong and the new one is more accurate.

          That said, neither are perfect. All of the adaptations make a lot of changes