Connect with Lunduke and other members of Lunduke community

The author may be a right-wing fellow. Nonetheless, the data he exposes are taken from official Mozilla docs.

  • Gargari@lemmy.mlEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I moved from FF to Vivaldi (couldn’t find better browser, and form that to LibreWolf) due to how shitty the Mozilla Corp is. We need a fair player here but doesn’t seem that we gonna have anything anytime soon

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      11·
      1 year ago

      Mozilla is shitty, so you’re opting for Google instead? That’s like saying the air quality is bad, and opting to jump in the ocean and drown.

    • monobot@lemmygrad.ml
      01·
      1 year ago

      Is there any organization with totally claear finances and nothing strange anywhere?

      I haven’t seen one.

      This analysis means nothing since it is only one daya point.

      Like saying “you are worst human being because you are jaywalked yesterday”, there is no comparstion with other companies in smiliar business.

      Those are Google and Microsoft. Are they really better than Mozilla

  • biscuitsofdeath@lemmy.mlEnglish
    11·
    1 year ago

    I read through it and I don’t know what the issue is?

    There seems to be an issue with Mozilla supporting diversity and inclusion. Also he has an issue with them having enough money to run the business. I.e. not living paycheck to paycheck.

    This article is nothing.

  • Gargari@lemmy.mlEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    Great post. Does it matter if it’s right or left wing? How did you concluded that

    • mplewis@lemmy.globe.pubEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      It absolutely matters. We need to consider that a right-wing actor is likely to exaggerate claims against an organization that is ostensibly socially-minded and represents anti-corporate interests, like Mozilla.

    • peotr26@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      1 year ago

      Lunduke is known to have been defending quite extremist (on the right side of the political spectrum) view point on certain subjects.

      As such, many people, me included, do not really like him.

        • darq@kbin.social
          1·
          1 year ago

          Ad hominem applies to arguments. The source of an argument does not affect the soundness of that argument.

          But it’s not a fallacy to question an overarching narrative based on the source. If a person keeps selectively choosing facts and twisting words to forward a specific narrative, it’s not fallacious to view what that person says with skepticism.

          Edit: Typo. Also changed “valid” to “sound”.

          • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
            1·
            1 year ago

            ad hominem: in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

            If you think his narrative is skewed and based on selectively chosen facts and twisted words, you could correct that.