• Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The author definitely is on the fediverse: @[email protected]

      The article may be fairly positive about Bluesky but how Bluesky separates out various functions like feeds, moderation/labeling, and data storage/portability is a definite advantage that I think should be discussed.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you think Mike Masnick does not spend enough time on the Fediverse, you do not spend enough time on the Fediverse.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah I was being a bit of an oblivious dick in my comment.

        I still disagree with him though.

        • JoBo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re not required to agree with him. But if your disagreement with the headline is stopping you from reading the article, you’re missing out. There’s some useful ideas described which Fedi-coders would do well to take notice of.

          • livus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re right and I have since read the article properly.

            I’m not a coder, just a casual, but it’s interesting, though I still disagree that it’s a good way to go.

            • JoBo@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              What is there to disagree with? He’s describing what looks like a very good system for federation (especially moderation), not telling anyone which way to go.