• Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m well aware of the existence of countless dwarf planets in the solar system, and the naming issues that arose from the discovery.

    I don’t mind that they called them dwarf planets. But I don’t know why everyone got so upset about it. It sounds like just another class of planet to me, which seems quite appropriate.

    I agree that they marketed the change about as poorly as they could.

    • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure, people have taken the matter way too personal. That’s mostly people who have a nostalgic relationship to their childhood classes about “the 9 planets”.

      As I’ve read, they made the definition in the particular way to remove gray areas of inaccurate meassurements. A celestial body shouldn’t be wrongly classified due to being a few kilometres larger than some limit, then be reclassified later due to better meassurements. Planets need to be somewhat spherical, orbit a star and clear their orbit from significant debris. They made a great system which doesn’t leave big gray areas. A planet is defined in a well thought out way by people way smarter than me.

      And then they go and call the non-planets “dwarf planets”.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve heard some push to just call them all “Worlds.” Planets, moons, asteroids, etc. and all, which is also fine by me.