• TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That is true. But the cost of getting quality garden beds together from the soil without yard-fill toxic contaminants, the wood or metal for the beds, and the produce starts and seeds, the water, and the labor can make it a loss financially. That said it is a great hobby and does yield very satisfying results.

    • crispyflagstones@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah, with sufficient unthoughtfulness, refusing to do research, and with poor enough planning, you can fuck up literally anything? I’m not sure what your point is. I didn’t say it was suitable for everybody, or that it magically cannot fail, or that it will always be worth it in all circumstances (if your soil’s contaminated, yes, you will want to be careful about how you garden and your costs will likely be higher), or that gardening, unlike anything else, is a good fit for everybody’s brain and that every single person can do it effectively.

      I just think it’s kinda dumb to go after home gardening as somehow not useful or valuable just because it’s not a complete, viable replacement for industrial agriculture. It’s a completely stupid false dichotomy.

      Basically you need to think about how to do it cost-effectively and sanely. Just like anything else you do (you do think about that, right?)

    • Nimrod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You know you don’t need “beds” made of wood and metal to grow plants, right? You’d be shocked to know that most plants just grow right in the ground. Raised beds offer some benefits for sure, but are completely unnecessary for most home gardens.