(the colors are whether and how much the stock rose, not credit rating)

yahoo news is not a news source but a site that republishes articles from other websites. you can tell from the top here that this is the exactly same article from Gadget Review

apparently the 404media part is just a part of the article where it cites previous incidents. so then we don’t even have a source for the meat of the article save a random X thread.

that’s not a summary; that’s the first paragraphs of the article

(CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0, the non–open-source part here being NC)

obviously LLM-generated article from an odd outlet that publishes five articles every hour

the news is real because it just regurgitates 404media

ICE wasn’t created, only transferred and renamed from the Immigration and Naturalization Service from the Treasury. There had to be an agency enforcing the era where we used a fucking ocean instead of the fucking wall. (There was a prosperous time of much freer immigration in between but my point is of course it was always a thing.) Finally, of course, ICE never and never intended to barge into cities and homes under the Bush like Trump did, nor did he forever change politics for the worse and blow up education and welfare and economic equality like Reagan did.

Could you source what you said about the PATRIOT Act’s sunset provisions?

I think Bush was bad but a lot of the bad stuff he did was somewhat reversible (ICE existed , plus it’s not his fault that ICE is now used as a papers-please. There was PATRIOT but we reversed it so it’s actually a great example of what I mean.) and relatively short-term. Reagan, meanwhile, made a giant hole in the infrastructure that is still ingrained within everything US today.

“As 4Chan has no assets in the United Kingdom (given that it has no connection to the United Kingdom), that would require you to show up in a US court as a platiff, waive soreign immunity, and overcome existing U.S. doctrine regarding the non-enforcement of foreign regulatory penalties.

—article!

that photo tho

This is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgenics, which has repetitively been empirically refuted.

conservatives think people should have more children and the study finds they do in fact have more children. i don’t see what the problem is here

curious, why was there ice in your bottle?

edit: i was genuinely curious guys i’m sorry!?

what was al-qaeda mostly funding then

fork found in kitchen

they’re trying to compete with Renault’s handsome EV designs

why is guy being bullied for writing what all can understand

I would expect them to be confused and suspicious of the term “surplus labor value”. If not, then education has a problem.

User survey shows the editors hold left-wing and right-wing beliefs about equally

all i found was that self-responses are preponderantly left/center-left: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2024-04-25/Recent_research

editors hold left-wing and right-wing beliefs about equally

source? i’d doubt that unless you’re defining liberals as right-wing here