Who burnt it?

Or you could just post things to their appropriate communities. Simple.

Fantastic meme, OP.

It was so eerily dystopian. Telling me how much they appreciate me and how valued I am as an employee, as their eyes trail from side to side while they read the prompter.

“I like to play IRQ Russian Roulette” killed me.

I got $100 and a video from a bunch of dead-eyed execs I’ve never seen before in my entire life thanking me for all the hard work that I do. I’d almost have rather just gotten nothing at all.

“This is how it’s always done, sir… on the second Tuesdays of months with an even number of days and for the full duration of Toyotathon. Now don’t make me repeat myself: laptop under the bag and over the shoes or we cavity search you.”

Is that not how this is already being implemented?

Weird seeing you again, and seeing you say this, after you quickly resorted to name-calling over a disagreement in another thread just 20 minutes ago. Do you really not think that you’re a member of the half you refer to? I’m not so sure you actually want “diversity of opinions” or “normal people” if that’s been your response so far.

Don’t make fun of him, it’s a family name.

Fuck the haters, pineapple pizza is delicious.

@[email protected] This seems like a reasonable instance for Fedia to block.

Who do you think suggested the idea to them? $10 says Elon directed Russia straight to a backdoor. He’s been itching to see Ukraine fail this whole time, I wouldn’t put it past him to directly interfere in such a way.

99.99% of the people willing to buy an emotional support robot for their children will have no idea what the words you said even mean.

Yeah, these are wildly different situations, and trying to draw comparisons between the two is disingenuous, at best. I’m not happy with the Penny situation, either, and there is plenty to criticize about that case, but the similarities to Mangione’s case end at “one man killed another man in a public space”.

I don’t know all the details, but I know they had basically unlimited break time, as well as free therapy/counseling. The pay was also pretty decent, especially for a job that didn’t require physical labor or a specialized background.

They did have a pretty strict vetting process, because it was apparently not uncommon at all for people to apply to the job because they were either eager to see abusive content directly, or had an agenda they might try to improperly influence what content gets seen. Apparently they did social media deep dives that you had to consent to, to apply.

Nobody wants to be the first.

Uh, technically a nazi killed Hitler.

Google/Youtube, who take zero action on people posting both horrible videos AND comments on said videos routinely

I used to share an office with YouTube’s content review team at a previous job and have chatted with a bunch of them, so I can give a little insight on this side. For what it’s worth, YT does take action on CSAM and other abusive materials. The problem is that it’s just a numbers game. Those types of reports are human-reviewed. And for obvious reasons, it’s not exactly easy to keep a department like that staffed (turns out you really can’t pay people enough to watch child abuse for 8 hours a day), so the content quickly outnumbers the reviewers. Different types of infractions will have different priority levels, and there’s pretty much always a consistent backlog of content to review.

While this article talks about Facebook, specifically, it’s very similar to what I saw with YouTube’s team, as well: https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/25/18229714/cognizant-facebook-content-moderator-interviews-trauma-working-conditions-arizona

I’ve never seen this before and had to look this up. A fantastic little piece of history, excellently memeified.