ContentConsumer9999

It’s definitely intentional that half of the #prices have #69 in it right?

I feel like the message here was more that the remaining userbase were bigots and there wasn’t anything worthwhile there.

Could you maybe give users the ability to exclude certain communities/hashtags? Some hashtags associated with communities like #fediverse seem to be overused to the point that following it barely filters content.

I was a fairly new user. It was mostly because it was a popular platform so sometime during the quarantine I just started exploring it.

I got the vibe that they were intentionally trying to parody incel language to point out the cameraman/someone else in the video was a creep but the comment section to this post makes me doubtful.

I use a Chrome extension that’s been discontinued so probably not.

I was just joking about the fact that every comment that disagreed with the guy got a singular downvote, presumably all from the guy.

I wonder who left that singular downvote?

Isn’t YTMP3 just illegal?

It still boosts their stats up.

Wait, do you actually have to pay for the original icon now? In what world do you make your actual logo a paid option? I hope this is only for the r/place event but with the recent changes I wouldn’t be surprised if they made everyone pay to not have the shitty pixel icon.

Wait, couldn’t people have used this to continue developing 3rd party apps?

They probably weren’t sure at the start of how much support they’d get so they decided to have a set date just so people could unite easier and would be more likely to take action. I’m sure they’d have suggested a longer period if they knew they’d get this much support. They probably also hoped Spez would’ve backed off by now.