Wow. You got my whole person figured from one comment on the internet. That’s an impressive talent.

Take your own advice

Disagree

disagree

It also doesn’t stop it

That’s the pot calling the kettle black

I didn’t choose. I don’t really understand how that’s hard to wrap your head around, but good attempt your propagandist

deleted by creator

But is that right or wrong?

Oh! Suddenly I’m not wrong for not voting because it was a choice between evil and evil? Very weird how that works out. I told you motherfuckers from the get-go, but yall didn’t want to listen

Downvote all you want. The choices are a farse, and the majority fell for it hook, line, and sinker

All the time, but every aspect should be considered. For example, there was one commenter in this chain that mentioned the potential of bacterium on Mars. If they exist and we land on Mars then we inadvertently impact said bacterium and potentially impact Mars on a scale that we can’t comprehend or at the very least understand. Is that right or wrong?

What I’m saying is the best evidence available might not be the right evidence

Is everyone who challenges your ideas a troll? Sorry. I’m still not trolling you OR arguing just to argue.

And let’s talk about the best decisions. Did Vlad The Impaler think it was the best decision? What about Ghengis Khan? Kubla Khan? Nobunaga Oda? Mitsuhede? Washington? King George? The list goes on and on… So who’s right, and who’s wrong?

They all had the best evidence available, yet thought that the best way was to oppose a different idea

Is that so? And what does “informed decision” mean to you?

No I’m not. Just say you don’t have an answer for that haha

Why?

So people are investments? And we have to ensure life stays or humans?

It’s highly probable that we aren’t the only life in the universe. The only thing that makes it impossible is we aren’t smart enough to know yet, but most signs point to that we can’t be the only life in the universe

So you’re saying that life doesn’t already exist in the cosmos?

Be honest. Trying to exclude the basic animal instinct of survival, who will you hold dear that will be affected by any of that? Sure, we can predict cosmic catastrophic events, but we still can’t stop them. And looking at a perspective that capitalists ((at least in the most recent history (current affairs)) have been the most interested in finding something off the planet and trying to figure out Mars.

Now, I also consider that going to Mars would be a long process. I bet my life that the first few crews that head toward Mars will either die or never be heard from again. There might be that one or two Wayland’s, but the vast majority of people who can afford to leave the planet won’t do so until they can be guaranteed a high chance of survival. Meaning that they’ll let a multitude of people die before they’ll allow themselves to be hurried off to a brand new start. You should know as well as I do that those billionaires aren’t going to save the masses. So even if sustainable existence occurs in our lifetime, are you sure the people you hold dear are going to be saved? And what right do we have to overpopulate another planet?