Honestly, I feel like Mastodon is kinda never going to be like Twitter, even if its user count were to grow by two orders of magnitude. There are several reasons why, as the other replies point out, but the most important (IMO) is that Mastodon is just not a profit-driven platform. And if Mastodon is not a profit-driven platform, it is not designed to maximize user engagement. And if it is not designed to maximize user engagement, it is not designed to encourage toxic behavior.

Osaka never was quite the same after the microplastics

Cornsider this

I’m all but one of those things!

♫ Which side are you on, which side are you on? ♫

That’s the more common variant, but “embrace, extend, exterminate” is also used.

Honestly, I don’t see why Threads couldn’t be intended to destroy both Twitter foremost, and also the fediverse before it’s big enough to pose any real threat: Mastodon has some two million monthly active users right now, which is tiny compared to Twitter/Threads, yes, but it’s also not nothing, especially for what Mastodon is and how quickly it managed to reach that level of usage.

So I don’t doubt that Threads has ill intentions for both the underdog and overdog. I just don’t think that the fediverse can be killed that easily.

Are people really saying “the fediverse is doomed”?

If by “strongest soldier” you mean “wannabe anarchist insurrectionary with twig arms and a repainted NERF gun from 2008”, then yeah, that’s me. Is the Star-‘n’-Bull really that iconic? :P

Or a V-line, or iliac furrows, or Adonis belt, or Apollo’s belt.

(“Come Out Ye Black and Tans” x “Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead” Eurobeat remix intensifies)

Curiously, I’ve seen a survey in Canada reporting the exact opposite.

Billionaires reinventing the train is out, billionaires reinventing the sailboat is in

The abolition of the state and the abolition of capital

gdje si bio 91