Hmm… remember some recent event in NYC?

Why don’t we pay our friend Elon a visit and [Redacted By lemmy.world Admins]

Non-fpv camera drones. I can’t really handle the quick reaction needed for fpv. And also I don’t really like to be in fpv.

I just explore places. Explore my neighborhood. Just observe as if I was a bird in the sky (I don’t hover over people lol, I fly at least 60 meters / 200ft up and just chill and watch the roads and traffic). I sometimes go to a nearby park (that has no drone restrictions) and have a wide unobstructed line of sight, and I explore the park, just fly past people at the park and just watch their reactions (again, not directly over their heads), people seem intrigued. Basically just free roaming the skies, free as a bird (with a limited range due to battery limitations). Longest distance I got was 4000 meter and I barely made it back with less than 10% battery left. I once lost a drone because I forgot about the headwind on the way back. 🙃

I currently have an Autel Evo Nano+

Used to have Potensic Atom (not bad for an “off brand” drone btw)

Before that is just shitty toy-grade “Holystone” drones.

I despise DJI because of Geofencing.

I think I found the best one:

infosec.pub

has 4186 total users and 335 active users

seems more active than the .cafe that the other user suggested

Good luck with converting more people to join Lemmy!

defed.xyz to check?

🤔 this seems like “How to transform your domesticated cat into a tiger 101”

Ez

I only 🏴‍☠️ memes from the other site, so I can post and crosspost to all meme communities here.

Sadly, I don’t think theres enough Drone enthusiasts here 😓.

Niche communities would never kick off here.

Lock Him Up

Wait… fuck, wrong timeline

😖

Can I hop to the other, less shitty timeline? (So we can actually #LockHimUp)

Does Enhance increase resolution like Movies/TV said it would?

🤔

/jk

More popular than JFK.

😏

Anonymous needs to do some hacktivism…

So, according to your link:

Definition:

Annexation,[1] in international law, is the forcible acquisition and assertion of legal title over one state’s territory by another state, usually following military occupation of the territory.

Opinion of Internation Law:

In current international law, it is generally held to be an illegal act.

International law says its illegal. The word doesn’t define it being inherently illegal.

The international law also says a lot of other things are illegal, but those acts are not inherently illegal, because the legality isn’t inherent to the word’s definition.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/annex

Bruh.

Fuck.

That was one of the niche communities that had great info.

GOS allows that to be bypassed?

Well fuck me, I wanna use Samsung Tags to track my cat, so can’t really get a Pixel to use GOS.

All news should use neutal language.

If journalist want to express their personal opinions, that’s what editorials are for.

A simple rewrite of the article title on the left to: “Russia annexes formerly Ukrainian territory. Ukraine and NATO declares the act to be unlawful”. Like this is much better, less biased title. Don’t make the claim yourself, tell who is saying it.

So here’s the thing:

I sometimes though I saw a ghost moving in a dark cornet of my eyes.

I didn’t see a ghost.

But then later I walk through the same place again, and also saw the same vision, but I already held the belief that ghosts dont exist, so I investigated, it turned out to be a lamp (that was off) that casted a shadow of another light source, so, when I happend to walk though the area, the shadow moved, and combined with my head turning motion, it made it appear like a ghost was there, but it was just a difference in lighting, a shadow. Not a ghost. I bet a lot of “ghosts” could be just interpreting lighting wrong and think its a ghost, not an actual ghost.

Having you thoughts/logics prioritized is important to find the truth, and not just start believing the first thing you interpret like a vision of a “ghost”.

deleted by creator

Not as far as I know.