Many municipalities don’t allow political parties

Or maybe we won’t vote for a democrat or a republican either one so a non vote isn’t a vote your way

Cops are a lot more available and plentiful so people can hone their skills. Plus it’s just all around good for humanity

No. The government has no right to accessing anybody’s materials. Warrant or not.

No. Even that limitation is unconstitutional. Look up the actual convictions and appeal rates for them

The most recent one is just a couple of months old where a guy threatened Kevin McCarthy, the House speaker, over 100 times on the phone and he only got probation because the judge knew the prison sentence wouldn’t withstand appeal.

I thought you were replying to me at first, but it just reaffirm what I said so now it looks like you were replying to someone else maybe

The ruling reaffirmed that the government cannot punish speech just because it is offensive or upsetting, reinforcing strong protections for free speech under the First Amendment.

Is it so hard to believe you think Free speech should be absolute weapon should be unrestricted, abortion should be unrestricted, people should be able to harness electricity from solar and harness rainwater from the sky?

Because these are all things that are restricted here except for speech, so I am sure as fuck not going to budge on it

When? Brandenburg V Ohio long predates them

Gaza is not a problem to me. I honestly don’t give a shit.

I don’t want anything except to be left alone, and neither party seems to be capable of doing that

Yes, it is.

That’s why all the Westborough Baptist people can stand around with God hates fags signs and nothing happens to them

Removed by mod

Chinese and Japanese soldiers during that time period would be a much more accurate comparison, and the answer is yes

Barack “I’ve got a pen, and I’ve got a phone.” Obama shows the same attitude from the other side.

It’s more palatable, but it’s still the same oppressive bullshit

Society and laws are at the mercy of those who are in control. Right now in the US it is the Trump administration, but I remember Barack Obama saying, “I’ve got a pen, and I’ve got a phone,” emphasizing his ability to take executive action without waiting for Congress to push his agenda forward.

That’s not freedom.

It doesn’t. It says free, meaning unencumbered. The breadstick analogy was for unlimited not free so it was disingenuous and I was countering it.

I’m banned from that platform because they do not believe in free speech absolutism, especially when you start in on churches and cops

There is no difference between those two phrases if you actually have free speech

And in fact, saying “I voted for Donald Trump”, is way more offensive to me than saying “kill everyone in Gaza”

The phrase “shouting fire in a crowded theater” is outdated and legally irrelevant to modern free speech discussions. Its origin from Schenck v. United States (1919) was overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), which set a much higher standard for restricting speech. Modern First Amendment doctrine protects almost all speech unless it directly incites imminent violence or crime.

Participating in an election means you are agreeing to abide by the outcome of the election. By not participating you are protesting and saying I not recognise the legitimacy of this process.

No, because it is unconstitutional to put someone under oath

By definition, it means a solemn promise that is beholden to a deity therefore it is illegitimate in court and law by the First Amendment.

You probably also think it should not be legal to kill people that break into your house to steal your TV.