There’s literally a response just below yours, but of course taking the time to make sure you’re actually right is never a strong point for you people.

I personally find it very funny that the pro-Palestinian go-to is that none of the offers Israel made for a 2 state solution were ‘realistic’ or ‘serious’ or ‘good faith’. No one doubts that there were offers. Tell me, in what other scenario in all of human history do the losers of a war (that they started) get to dictate the terms of their surrender?

What’s the ethnic makeup of Israel? What’s the ethnic makeup of Palestine? Which one is closer to the definition of an ethno state? Do words not mean anything to you?

This may be tough to understand but there’s a ton of still completely-intact, dense urban environment in between the border and the school in your scenario. So on your way to the school, you can be ambushed.

Or hey, maybe thinking strategically even a little bit, maybe the school, or the road, or any of the surroundings are booby-trapped! Maybe they’ve planted IEDs or mines on the path there!

It’s very far fetched, I know. Humans haven’t been waging war for forever, there isn’t a giant history to pull from.

“The terrorists are using schools as shields though!”

“Oh damn that’s a genius strategy. Better just give up every military advantage I have and send in my soldiers to be ambushed.”

I don’t understand this. Businesses are organizations of people that get together to produce something and sell it.

In this scenario is someone else producing the thing the business is restricting?