Eh, you’re being lazy. Just compile the kernel from source.

Giulliani tryna look hard, but just looking like he can’t remember where he left his teeth.

He’s had 96 charges filed against him. You’re an absolute loony.

OK, so this is one of those comments that’s either “wtf, of course everyone knows that” or “oh shit, ok”, but generally wake on USB is a bios setting. Have you looked around in the bios to see what your options are?

Doesn’t explain the weird behaviour, but may be a good way forward.

Does he have the right to a trial before a jury of his peers?

He is being tried for his crimes. That you want him treated arbitrarily worse in the meantime just seems capricious. The decision to keep someone in custody while they wait for trial is made on a well established set of principles, not based on your need to see him humiliated for your entertainment.

The DoJ following procedure is a sign that they are taking this seriously and not just pandering to people crying out for blood and entertainment.

I don’t understand. How is the DoJ shrugging it off when he’s been indicted on federal charges?

OK then, I guess we see differently to you.

Have a great day.

Android has 41% market share in the US. It sounds like you’ve got some pretty heavy sampling bias going on.

So you saw the part where he shows how massively it’s changed and literally says that it doesn’t even look like the same program?

Did you watch the first 30 seconds of the video?

Lol, I thought it looked like an AC/DC song!

I was wondering if the Android fingerprint login had been compromised since the days of the gummybear attacks. For anyone else who was wondering: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/android-phones-are-vulnerable-to-fingerprint-brute-force-attacks/

Interesting question OP, I’ll be (academically) interested in the answer.

Edit: this Tasker answer is fiddly and very old, but may be worth looking into: https://android.stackexchange.com/questions/139653/can-i-make-android-require-fingerprint-pin-to-unlock-the-screen

deleted by creator

OK, I didn’t read before answering, probably ignore my answer below but I’ll leave it up incase someone learns something from it.

Edit: misunderstood what OP wanted to do, leaving this here in case it’s interesting to anyone.

Sounds like what you are tyring to do is called Split Horizon DNS.

Requests from outside your network should resolve server.domain.com to the public IP, but requests from inside your network should resolve it to the private IP.

If that’s what it is then you register the public IP with your nameservers. You also run a DNS service internally which you point all your computers at (likely by putting it as the DNS server in your networks DHCP settings). That DNS server is set up to return the private ip addresses for all your servers, and to forward any other requests to some external DNS like 1.1.1.1

I’m not sure what your use case or for needing to use the internal IP address from inside the network, but it might be to avoid traffic exiting your network just to be sent back in? Or you me a that you want external requests to go to one server and internal to go to another server? I’m which case the set up above still works, but on just use the appropriate IP addresses in the appropriate places.

Also, thanks, that’s awesome!

OK, but is coffee a soup?

Start with -2 bread and add one bread.

They’re usually clearly documented in support forums by people saying “MY STUFF WON’T BOOT PLESE HALP”