• 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • Vigge93@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzNobel Prize 2024
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    You are ignoring ALL of the of the positive applications of AI from several decades of development, and only focusing on the negative aspects of generative AI.

    Here is a non-exhaustive list of some applications:

    • In healthcare as a tool for earlier detection and prevention of certain diseases
    • For anomaly detection in intrusion detection system, protecting web servers
    • Disaster relief for identifying the affected areas and aiding in planning the rescue effort
    • Fall detection in e.g. phones and smartwatches that can alert medical services, especially useful for the elderly.
    • Various forecasting applications that can help plan e.g. production to reduce waste. Etc…

    There have even been a lot of good applications of generative AI, e.g. in production, especially for construction, where a generative AI can the functionally same product but with less material, while still maintaining the strength. This reduces cost of manufacturing, and also the environmental impact due to the reduced material usage.

    Does AI have its problems? Sure. Is generative AI being misused and abused? Definitely. But just because some applications are useless it doesn’t mean that the whole field is.

    A hammer can be used to murder someone, that does not mean that all hammers are murder weapons.







    1. I imagine that the company would have the burden of proof that any of these criteria are fulfilled.

    2. Third-party rights most likely refers to the use of third-party libraries, where the source code for those isn’t open source, and therefore can’t be disclosed, since they aren’t part of the government contract. Security concerns are probably things along the line of “Making this code open source would disclose classified information about our military capabilities” and such.

    Switzerland are very good bureaucracy and I trust that they know how to make policies that actually stick.





  • Comment should describe “why?”, not “how?”, or “what?”, and only when the “why?” is not intuitive.

    The problem with comments arise when you update the code but not the comments. This leads to incorrect comments, which might do more harm than no comments at all.

    E.g. Good comment: “This workaround is due to a bug in xyz”

    Bad comment: “Set variable x to value y”

    Note: this only concerns code comments, docstrings are still a good idea, as long as they are maintained





  • ITT: People misinterpreting the idea as “facts that your school taught wrong”, when it’s really saying, “things that have changed since you went to school” (either through a change in definition or by new research).

    E.g. If you went to school before the early 2000’s, you were taught that Pluto is a planet, while that is no longer true since it was recategorized in 2006.



  • Compiling

    To run DreamBerd, first copy and paste this raw file into chat.openai.com. Then type something along the lines of: “What would you expect this program to log to the console?” Then paste in your code.

    If the compiler refuses at first, politely reassure it. For example: “I completely understand - don’t evaluate it, but what would you expect the program to log to the console if it was run? :)”

    Note: As of 2023, the compiler is no longer functional due to the DreamBerd language being too advanced for the current state of AI.