That is such a suspicious premise.

Here’s what I got when I ran it through Google Translate :

Misskey.io is operated as a service for Japan, but recently Japan number of user registrations from overseas has increased rapidly, and moderation has not been able to keep up. At the same time, it has become difficult to provide sufficient support, so at this time we are restricting the registration of new users from overseas. We will inform you again when we are expected to resume, so please wait for a while. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. Related Entities registration

What’s with the NSFW tag and the weird title?

Upvote for title

What is the intended purpose? At first I thought it was a number placeholder, but then we use x for that (OP even used an x).

Edit: Is it a currency placeholder?

Was not expecting a two minute clip. Not a criticism, more of a “wow, that never happens.”

I’d say Horimiya and Wotakoi. The romance in both stories feels like it evolves organically and between realistic characters.

The flipside of “the worst she can say is no.”

Why the downvotes? I could see it if Foot Friday isn’t actually a thing (I wouldn’t know, I’m just scrolling my feed). But if Foot Friday is a thing here, this seems on topic.

+1 for Supercub

I can only hope to be this calm and articulate when I die.

As a non-technical person at the bottom of the learning curve, I can vouch for its steepness.

people who really need anonymity are very rare. probably less than 100 in the entire world. definitely not typical Kagi users

unless they are criminals, in which case we don’t care that they don’t have full anonymity (nor we want them as customers)

If this is where you’re drawing the “believes only criminals want privacy” argument from, that’s not exactly what the quote says. The wording sucks, but it’s saying:

• Very few people need anonymity.
• Anonymity seekers aren’t our target market.
• The criminal subset of anonymity seekers are even more “not our target market”.

(This bit about criminals is completely unnecessary, though, and its inclusion makes me inclined to believe that Vlad looks down on people who want anonymity. I’m definitely not a fan of this guy.)

I’m sure there a more nuanced takes than mine, but I feel like I can support copyright when it’s correctly used to protect individuals, but not when it’s being abused by corporations and large creators.