This is one of the most sensible comments in the thread. The law is the problem. This is something which should have been self regulated by websites themselves, but Meta lobbied for laws like this so they wouldn’t have to police it. The law making this mandatory for everyone when this should be a parental control is the issue.
IMO the benefit and curse is you could fork it, maintain it, patch it yourself, etc if you wanted, but then its a full time job keeping it up to date with changes. As others have pointed out, this is a decisive change, so a fork probably wouldn’t be a solo project, but the bifurcation in development would be a large impact, slowing development in other fixes and features.
On three separate occasions over the course of many years, I ran into an issue and searched Stack Overflow for anyone else having the same problem. The approved answer was exactly what I needed, and went to go hit the upvote button, only to realize I can’t upvote it because I was the author of the answer.
Name a woman
Agreed, but without showing it, it would be extremely confusing to the audience. After watching the extended scene, it would have been really bad if they left that all in. Plus the scene is funny with the eddie van halen tape, and also uses the contents of Doc’s luggage with the hair dryer for another gag.
I watched the broadcast TV show leading up to the movie, and the behind the scene of how they pulled off Museum Heist was one of the best things I’ve ever seen. Can’t wait to watch the movie.
FWIW, Brave still supports manifest v2 and the full version of uBlock Origin. Chrome has uBO Lite since they only have manifest v3 now. Firefox and LibreWolf don’t have to deal with this, and still support the real uBlock Origin. I’m not sure what exactly Brave “shield” is doing, but I think if you use EFF’s privacy badger on Firefox and block third party cookies, you are getting the same thing.
ok
Thank you, not sure why OP didn’t cross-post the original post here?
This is how the scene was in the final cut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHZctSnNrsw
Exactly, if only the three largest oil companies had to increase their production to account for the global shortage, the percentage increase would be more that 20% to make up for other companies not increasing. Please don’t take this as me defending the oil companies, but instead me defending the math.
I get this is just a meme, but this isn’t how the percents work out. If global throughput is down 20%, each company needs to increase their own production by 20% to get the global throughput back to normal.
So that means everyone is either bi or ace?
It’s probably more likely that straight people don’t even exist. Everyone is a little bit gay.
Ok, I think I get what you’re saying. You mean have a different form input without the password, like how it’s done here: https://eu.app.orcasecurity.io/login? I guess that’s one way to do it, but it’s not really intuitive from a user perspective, since the first thing you see is a password field, and then think you don’t have access because you don’t have a password. This one comes to mind because I have had to tell people to click the tab for the email only field, not email and password.
Not sure I’d take design inspiration from Microsoft of all places. Also https://login.live.com/ has the same workflow email -> continue -> password. Not sure where you’re seeing Log in with SSO option.
And if you comply with unjust laws, then it’s way harder to challenge them in the courts.