Is there any way to find information about the company or “director” of the trailer? It is really an amazing work of video and audio editing.

Are you lost? Come with me, I will help you find your mommy.

Except for it being called Blade Runner and not striking any resemblance to the original.

If it came out as it’s own thing I would have called it a good movie, although a bit bland and with poorly written characters, but as a sequel to Blade Runner, no way.

And The Hobbit (respect to Del Toro for giving up before it was too late). And Justice League (even if, after Dawn of the Dead and 300, Snyder never did a good one again).

BR2049 is shit. A mix of uninspired stuff, nice concept art and fan service, with a bad CGI Rachel.

I love Villeneuve’s work elsewhere, but there he really fucked up.

Last time I checked Assange was never a journalist. I think it is terrible what happened to him and I hope I can keep expecting that only from China, Russia, the USA and a few others, but this is false information and actually it explains the whole reason why the USA could very easily apply the Espionage Act in such a way.

He used Not Sure as a smokescreen since the beginning, the whole point is that he never really understood what was going on. I am quite sure that American presidents are approaching that level of idiocy.

This is what I love about Mike Judge’s work. It turns out to be always the best metaphor/reference/prophecy of the boring dystopia. Since 1999.

Do we have /c/swoosh in here?

DuckDuckGo is surprisingly good. It is my go-to atm on all my computers. If it only had better maps…

As an Italian, thank you! This is the worst of the worst our country has to offer to the world and having a glorifying biopic about it is degrading to all of us.

Without the need to resort to blatant racist theories, my bet is still on tax arrangements.

And a huge disruption of astronomical research.

That was not the assumption. Also, that map is either 20something years too early or too late to be proof of much of what was going on in the 1950s.

There are a lot of assumptions there.

First of all, I am sure that is part of something much larger and it is a real neighborhood, not something hypothetical.

Second, I don’t see people giving up their car brains just because you put a tram. I myself would still be using a car if it wasn’t made completely superfluous and fatiguing where I live and work.

Nah not really, such low population density requires cars to be used. If you think tearing that down would be simple, then yes. But I think that even in Atlanta that would be difficult. The reason why those highways are there is that more people wanted to live in that kind of neighborhood.

Am I the only one who finds the 1950s version also not nice from an urban planning perspective? I mean, it is a car-centered design anyway.

I am looking forward to see the repo man collecting it since it was only a licensed company asset, especially since it is fused with her own tissues.

That’s because you are not enforcing data portability at the same time. Having studied and discussed the GDPR at length within tech circles, I became convinced that data portability is the ultimate right and the key to ensure continuing innovation