To anyone wondering, this is from the documentary comedy movie “Idiocracy”.

Archive link: https://archive.is/2026.06.07-084649/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/06/us/politics/trump-pardon-stephen-buyer-insider-trading.html

Found this doc from the epstein files that refers to the reported incident of a sex trafficked woman’s baby being killed while Trump was present: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 8/EFTA00025010.pdf

Thanks. Point taken. Will revise my post.

According to Google’s LLM the list of Republican members of that committee are those below. If this is your rep, call or write (democracy.io makes it easy!) to share your position.

James Comer Kentucky Chair
Jim Jordan Ohio
Mike Turner Ohio
Paul Gosar Arizona
Virginia Foxx North Carolina
Glenn Grothman Wisconsin
Michael Cloud Texas
Gary Palmer Alabama
Clay Higgins Louisiana
Pete Sessions Texas
Andy Biggs Arizona
Nancy Mace South Carolina
Pat Fallon Texas
Byron Donalds Florida
Scott Perry Pennsylvania
William Timmons IV South Carolina
Tim Burchett Tennessee
Marjorie Taylor Greene Georgia
Lisa McClain Michigan
Lauren Boebert Colorado
Russell Fry South Carolina
Anna Paulina Luna Florida
Chuck Edwards North Carolina
Nick Langworthy New York
Eric Burlison Missouri
Eli Crane Arizona

Dailymotiom is french so I had hoped that anyone wanting to watch them could just go there. However, I don’t see most of the videos in question there.

Looks like the videos exist on this Russian video hosting site: https://m.vkvideo.ru/?q=Lego+trump&action=search

OP - Looks like you forgot to include a link to the new community.

A good rule of thumb is that when something sounds unbelievable you should assume that the source is made up until you locate substantial evidence to confirm the claim. Nowadays, video clips are misrepresented or even fabricated altogether. If this particular claim had been spread far at all and a few days had passed, there would be articles online (at non-junk websites) discussing it. I’m not seeing any such articles in this case.

My personal rule is not to mention such “big unverifiable claim” topics until I’m able to verify and educate myself on it. That avoids me feeling silly by being unable to respond to any probing questions about the big claim. It also avoids spreading the idea that the story is accurate. If all I can say is “I saw it in a feed full sourced from publishers that I don’t necessarily trust” and the claim is unbelievably wild that’s my “stop signal”.

In case the headline didn’t tip you off, this is a satire website. :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme

They likely meant tries / prefix trees.

I’ll assume that you mean that the establishment decided to kick the two of you out. That’s a sucky feeling. Could be that he has been a problem there in the past.