That implies someone had given birth to them. ( No everone has niblings.)
And who said that they’re parents would allow you to teach em your world view? ( Especially as those parents did create children and you didn’t. Hence I presume they would also like to have grandchildren. And you would discourage that.)
I do, and I agree. But also there is much more significant impacts to our enviorment. (Buildings, Planes and Cars for example). And If we stop producing offspring because of “moral” reasons, people without such reasons will create offspring and spread theyr world view to the next generation. And the next generation will still have the issues but now with less people that are able / intrested in solving the enviormental issue. ( Idocracy scenario).
I guess its up to you if you think that your world view is not worth spreading.
Well people with connections to the goverment need a way to launder money.
That is true we need to fix the problem. So in your analogy you would’ve stopped giving the person pain medication?
And how is the person crippled by pain supposed to stand, walk or excercise without pain medication?
I get it addition to pain medication is bad. I would assume most people know that, even those addicted. But the alternative is those people succumbing to pain, which would prevent any improvments.
Hence, yes I agree. Just throwing around money is not going to be the solution, but so is also not giving any.
I agree that incorrect administration of welfare can lead to that. But thats also the politicians job to manage.
Thats also comparable to saying I don’t visit doctors I fear a mistreatment.
“Nowdays there are many new dangers in the forest, like furries and feet lovers.” ~ Bigfoot
Wendigoon’s serial killer tierlist. Makes me also sleepy.
You do. But not the politicians who actually get it into law. Also who has decided you are the spokesperson of the pro life movement?
No, the therapist came to this conclusion on his own by seeing his mother.
Any revolutions co authors motives as a cat meme.
As per the other articles, you know collaborators are picked just because.
And you think from the hundreds of thousand of collaborators they will punish them mildly and selectivity?
Yea but also per Ukrainian law you are not allowed to hold two citizensships. Hence you either dont have one or are a Russian for the Ukrainian goverment.
Ukraines plans with Russian citizens if they win the war.
https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-crimea-9da550b396f42cc267a4808bf99d5e6d
True that. But now we are already in the mess, ain’t we?
True that. But also supporting one side with Intel, equipment and volunteers. Is nothing new. Its a pritty common geopolitical move. If any other country had a civil war on they’re border I’d think they would also go around doing the same. Any historian may check but I think thats pre Napoleonic.
Yes. Now they got the passports.
Now read what happens when they got it. https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-crimea-9da550b396f42cc267a4808bf99d5e6d
Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in “what about…?”) is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense of the original accusation.
What I did not do. I told you the claim of genocide does not apply as the amount of civilian casualties is lower that other similar scaled modern wars. Who did I accuse in my counter accusation?
Then they don’t have any left. Because Ukraine aint giving them the Ukrainian.
True, but also friends and family are usually either same age or older. ( as in the other response) I assume parents would prefer to have grandchildren, so they would not apprecheate your anti children sentiment spread by you to they’re children.
True, adoption is also a good thing generally. But to help the genetical pool be diverse and healthy some children of your own wouldnt be bad.