[…] Curio’s Grok, an anthropomorphic rocket with a removable speaker, is also somewhat opaque about its underlying tech, though its privacy policy mentions sending data to OpenAI and Perplexity. (No relation to xAI’s Grok — or not exactly; while it’s not powered by Elon Musk’s chatbot, its voice was provided by the musician Claire “Grimes” Boucher, Musk’s former romantic partner.)
<applies brain bleach liberally>
whatcha think? Is an upcoming gonzo horror/action flick really about Rationalists, or are the creators blissfully unaware those people even exist?
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QpFzsrB7MLT7PaMGi/makoyass-s-shortform?commentId=YGzgyPowJPkHDyRqp
There was a ton of panic here in Sweden too. Specifically I heard of entities like councils and public boards like unemployment who were braced for a ton of data deletion requests that had to be fixed within 24 hours or something like otherwise huge legal fees. AFAIK nothing like that happened.
To be clear, I can’t edit Wikipedia to save my life. Editor in this case was Elestrophe.
I want to keep bots from scraping my content because I don’t want to feed the slop machine.
You want to keep bots from scraping your content because you’re afraid it’s gonna learn how to take over the world.
We are not the same.
Fix0red
None of those are well defined “problems”. An entire applied research field is not a “problem” akin to other items on this list lik P vs NP.
The cookie popups are basically malicious compliance.
But many yanks (even geeks) have an instinctive dislike of anything that smacks of government regulation. They’re conditioned to see corporations as good, or rather, that competition between corporations will always lead to good outcomes, and that anything that disrupts that competition as bad.
just had some onboarding training about the GDPR and I really don’t get US “privacy activists” disdainful view of it. It puts the individual before corporations. Sad if it’s atttempted to be gutted
Guys, the reason we don’t see working AI out in the world is because all the “frontier AI labs” are keeping the good stuff for themselves!! It’s totally not that this shit doesn’t work
How old is this utterance (the source link doesn’t work for me). From context it looks like just after Charlie Kirk got freeze peached.
I regret to inform you that the creator is a coiner
also all-in on AI
This looks like a rebranding of Urbit: Radiant Computer
Has AI in its guts but not something they mention on the front page. Slop images throughout tho
https://radiant.computer/system/os/ - “It’s an AI-native operating system. Artificial neural networks are built in and run locally. The OS understands what applications can do, what they expose, and how they fit together. It can integrate features automatically, without extra code. AI is used to extend your ability, help you understand the system and be your creative aid.”
https://radiant.computer/system/network/ - “Radiant rejects the Web as a general purpose software platform, while embracing the Internet protocols as the powerful substrate on which sovereign technologies like Tor, BitTorrent, Gemini and Bitcoin are built.”
drivers have mixed some trucker speed into their cokes
Google is space data-center curious, too:
https://research.google/blog/exploring-a-space-based-scalable-ai-infrastructure-system-design/
Unstoppable IP enforcers meet unmovable slop generator?
I have an analog Casio G-Shock that’s the perfect beater watch - radio controlled, solar charging, I can discern the hands in the dark without glasses, and almost indestructible. It wasn’t terribly expensive either.
I think Casio is threading the needle quite well with new technology. I’m sure they’re exploring pure smart watches, but the core ideal is “no maintenance” - you don’t have to change the battery or set the time[1]. This naturally leads to tough, energy-concious engineering, and as they make millions of watches, they have economies of scale.
The newer models have BT low energy so you can use the admittedly fiddly controls with an app. But you don’t need to. It’s just a complement.
[1] obviously this only applies to the more expensive models, and if your local time source supports DST
Big Yud posts another “banger”[1], and for once the target audience isn’t impressed:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/3q8uu2k6AfaLAupvL/the-tale-of-the-top-tier-intellect#comments
I skimmed it. It’s terrible. It’s a long-winded parable about some middling chess player who’s convinced he’s actually good, and a Socratic strawman in the form of a young woman who needles him.
Contains such Austean gems as this
If you had measured the speed at which the resulting gossip had propagated across Skewers, Washington – measured it very carefully, and with sufficiently fine instrumentation – it might have been found to travel faster than the speed of light in vacuum.
In the end, both strawmen are killed by AI-controlled mosquito drones, leaving everyone else feeling relieved .
Commenters seem miffed that Yud isn’t cleaning up his act and writing more coherently so as to warn the world of Big Bad AI, but apparently he just can’t help himself.
[1] if by banger you mean a long, tedious turd. 42 minute read!
It’s been a while since I used Reddit. Is the thesis that subscribers to ChatGPT will be rounded up and killed? By whom? For what stated reason? It sounds like a weird inversion of victimhood, considering the number of GenAI user (even if they’re just casual users) and the massive money and hype around GenAI by companies and way too many govs.
There’s a piece from Anthropic making the rounds stating they “disrupted” an “AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign”. Any meat on those bones or is it just the usual critihype?
https://www.anthropic.com/news/disrupting-AI-espionage