I really enjoy the ::woosh:: in the comments over the symbolism.

I have good news for you:

https://open.spotify.com/track/0bcBDZprbPETfPnmWsAsy4

You sure that’s a tongue piercing there?

Guys have you not tried pegging? Highly recommend.

https://lemmy.world/post/20843156

I was gonna ask if Josh Lyman has a new job?

I hope this is your highest voted comment on Lemmy.

Let me help you with the cis dude perspective. I’ll explain it to you in a way you can understand. I’m a guy, I know. . . . /s

The ring man.

Drop the link brother.

Task failed successfully.

“We’re going to have some fun too.” GET IT K-DOG.

For an Internet discussion, I really appreciate your open and honest exchange. Good day fellow Internet person.

Ok next question, because I think I interpreted the term differently than you did.

There are two types of term limits right? Quantity of terms, and length of terms.

Status quo: Q - one term, L - for life.

Wouldn’t limiting the length but not the quantity maintain the incentive for impartiality? So there is no concept of a second term?

I’m not trolling btw, I’m looking for an honest airing of the Q.

ELI5, How does no term limits allow for impartiality?

I want a dark post apocalyptic Logan style Bond with Pierce Brosnan. Take the franchise into a hard left turn for just one movie.

Dilution is the solution to this pollution

As a practitioner of the dark arts, I recommend trying it once.