Caution: The English article uses the word bullet which is misleading.

Source article partial translation:

For now, it is unknown who or what fired at the Polish officers. What is known is that it was an object that hit the border guard vehicle with great force. As Col. Arkadiusz Tywoniuk of the border guards conveyed, “The speed and kinetic energy were significant”.

I don’t know if it was fired from some kind of air weapon. In any case, the object pierced the vehicle’s side window, flew out the other side, and pierced another window. I emphasize that two officers were seated in the vehicle, also risked endangering their life and health," he pointed out.

What would possibly be the consequences for either parent or child if they violate?

If the law designed is any good, there should be none. The responsibility to check whether the parent has agreed should be laid on the social media giants, not the child or the parent. It should be a tool for parents to control the social media consumption of their kids. And after reading the article, which I highly recommend, it seems to be the case:

The broad law comes with heavy burdens for online platforms. It requires basically any digital services provider that collects an email at sign-up to conduct age verification to identify all minors, verify parents or guardians connected to all minors identified, and secure parental consent for a wide range of account activity.

Please read the articles that you post. Asking follow-up questions that are already answered is a little stupid.

Not the OP, but I think what they’re infering is tax evasion using charity foundations. Vox video about the topic.

Good b… Oh wait, we need more useful bots on Lemmy

What’s the benefit of doing this apart from a technical challenge and fun? Such a server wouldn’t support the network in any way, right?