Removed by mod

every time someone tried to call me in i would say i’ve had alcoholic drinks; they shut up pretty quick after that.

dunno, if it does, then yay?

popOS just because they have an installer that includes nvidia drivers out of the box.

i agree with the first part

you know, good for her, i guess, but i absolutely fucking hate that they just paint this picture of her like a normal, well adjusted person who happened to get involved in some Weird Shit, because she has to have ignored or dismissed a LOT of red flags to get to where she was.

i’m glad she finally did her due diligence, but i don’t think she deserves a glossy write up about how she did a little oopsy fucky wucky that may have made many children’s lives measurably worse.

i am sure it will be “too expensive” for the next 30 to 40 years.

same, i also abuse free trials pretty hard.

(virtual credit cards and visa gift cards with little to no money on them work great)

click bait never changes or whatever.

yup. i’m tied to unreal engine 5.

(yes, i know there’s a version for linux. i need to be on windows for the latest updates and work though.)

sorry i live a happy well-rounded life and don’t know what any of this means.

i like this

oh hell yea new tech connections video

lol no, that’s the most american thing about me and i refuse.

i literally use metric for everything else in my day job and overall life; but for temperature, Fahrenheit makes more sense to me. 100 F? deadly. 70 F? great. 50 F? chilly. 0 F? deadly.

in exchange for almost never running it during the day: i turn my A/C down to like 68 F overnight and sleep like a baby.

i’m going to snap and i’m going to

jesus christ you should be shoved into a locker

hmm, this is sort of helpful.

this is pretty much what i think, yeah.

a lot of programming/software design is already kinda that anyway. it’s a bunch of people who were educated on computer science principles, data structures, mathematicians, and data analytics/stats who write code to specs to solve very specific tool problems for very specific subsets of workers, and who maintain/update legacy code written decades ago.

now, yeah, a lot things are coded from scratch, but even then, you’re referencing libraries of code written by someone awhile ago to solve this problem or serve this purpose or do thing, output thing. that’s where LLMs shine, imo.

i didn’t downvote you, regardless internet points don’t matter.

you’re not wrong, and i largely agree with what you’ve said, because i didn’t actually say a lot of the things your comment assumes.

the most efficient way i can describe what i mean is this:

LLMs (this is NOT AI) can, and will, replace more and more of us. however, there will never, ever be a time where there will be no human overseeing it because we design software for humans (generally), not for machines. this requires integral human knowledge, assumptions, intuition, etc.