The point I’m trying to make is some people don’t want risk getting raided by the fbi just to give people free games

As far as I can tell Filecoin works by having clients pay to store files on people’s servers so there’s still a question of who is going to pay for it.

Then give me your money /s

This is a great (free) illustrated book about logical fallacies:

https://bookofbadarguments.com/

It’s more like $500

My point is that a contributor to open source software can contribute just to help people because they don’t have to worry about legal repercussions.

Mods and open source software are not illegal.

Once again, why would they share their cracks if its for personal use?

Yeah but why take that risk? They don’t really gain anything.

I think it’s more likely that there are others who don’t publicly share their cracks because they doesn’t want legal trouble/attention.

Use libreddit, a privacy preserving front end for reddit.

https://l.opnxng.com/r/modcoord

Yeah but I believe people have to pay her and she’s kind of unstable too.

It’s not a puff piece, it’s an interview that clearly prefaced his comments with background info about Denuvos performance impact. You can disagree with it (I do) without discrediting the article. Also, as far as I know Denuvo games have always been slower to crack.

Both

He’s not wrong though.

I think the difference is Google is just linking you to this content. On the other hand ChatGPT is pretty confidently telling people all these things. Add the fact that a lot of people consider ChatGPT to be some sort of all-knowing entity and it’s a recipe for disaster.

W