Ce să vă zic, mă, bine ați venit? bine ați venit, rău ați nimerit. La locu’ ăsta îi zice șerpărie, de la șerpii care umblă pe-aicea. Dracu’ știe cum au ajuns…

  • 83 Posts
  • 440 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • @iii He really was unknown, and I can tell you that as a Romanian. He was actually more known by some parts of our political establishment (or should I say, our former political establishment now) than the public. Literally every single person I spoke with was like, “who is this guy? I don’t know him. I only read about him a few days ago”. So no, it’s not like he had any public notoriety at all. Many people said online that they voted for him especially because he was unknown and wanted to “waste”/“cancel” their vote. I personally barely heard about him, I remember I heard about him when he was proposed by AUR as a prime minister a few years ago and that was it, I completely forgot about him again.

    I only heard about him a few weeks prior to the election, but I always thought it was some weird ass candidate who thinks he’ll win the elections, but will barely gather 5% at best (we have these types across all the political spectrum). Then I also Googled a bit to find more info about him and found who he actually is. But I still thought he won’t reach the mainstream. Again, there are people that were more vocal during the campaigns, and they didn’t even reach 10%.

    For reference, Trump had appeared in various TV shows like Fox&Friends or The Celebrity Apprentice, he appeared in the Home Alone series, he even got the Trump Tower. And overall, he was a really notorious and successful businessman. Georgescu had none of these. So even if the people were justified to vote for him (hell, I’m not denying this, vote for whoever you want, we’re a democracy after all), given this fact and declarations like the chance of Romania is the Russian wisdom and others like that, this is something that should be investigated.

    @Kissaki







  • Key takeaways after the election results (it’s 10:28 now and the votes are still counted, but I will edit/update this as necessary):

    1. The Romanian democracy still works! Despite Iohannis, Ciolacu and other influent politicians’ best efforts, despite the intelligence increased inference in the politics, there is still room for surprise. Whether Georgescu was supported by the Romanian intelligence in a bid to get a runoff between Ciolacu and him (to the advantage of the latter) or by the Russian intelligence to get a pro-Russian president in one of the most important Eastern flanc members, that remains to be seen. The thing is that, politically, neither Georgescu nor Lasconi were widely known on a national level before the elections. Georgescu has been previously proposed by AUR as a prime minister while a member of it and Lasconi previously won the City Hall of a small mountain town called Câmpulung Muscel (after this summer, she was now at her 2nd term). But both were pretty much no-namers in the national politics.
    2. Lasconi showed herself unprepared in the debate and it showed. Now she has to prepare herself a lot more than she should have done before if she wants to win the race. I do not think it’s enough for her to pose as the more democratic candidate. Also, any democratic party (or at least that calls itself democratic - looking at your PSD and PNL) should back her and support her with all their power. PSD should give its entire apparatus to her in these elections, or else it has much to lose after these elections. These are the first ever elections after 1989, where none of the established parties made it to the 2nd round. I don’t think however that Lasconi will get unconditional support from them, as she would do in an ideal world. This leads us to…
    3. This will be the first ideological battle for the seat of the president after a long time. I’m not sure if in the 1990s the situation was different, with Iliescu running against Ion Rațiu, or Radu Câmpeanu, or even Emil Constantinescu for that matter. Probably in the 2000s when Iliescu ran against Vadim. But as of late, the discussion shifted a lot towards corruption or administrative related issues. Nonetheless, despite her conservative past, Lasconi called herself Kamala Harris of Romania (which was a bit cringe for me tbh, in this regard), so we will pretty much have a re-run of the US elections on a smaller scale, as Georgescu is an open fan of Ion Antonescu and the legionnaires, and had a court decision of him abusing his wife.
    4. I’m sorry, Andrew, the Matrix did not break today.










  • Update Monday, 11:50 AM local time: Ziarul de Gardă published the map of the preliminary results of the elections.

    There is also an easier to read map on r/Moldova, back on the spez site.

    With the elections coming to a close, international reactions started to flow, most of them congratulating Maia Sandu, with Emmanuel Macron even writing a message in Romanian on X (formerly known as Twitter):

    preview.redd.it/utmakul7otyd1.…

    Translation:

    I would like to congratulate Maia Sandu on her re-election as President of the Republic of Moldova. Democracy has triumphed in the face of all interference and maneuvering. France will continue to stand by Moldova on its European path

    Other leaders who congratulated Maia Sandu were Ursula von der Leyen, Roberta Metsola, as well as the exiled leader of the Belarus opposition, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.


    As a personal note, I would also like to thank you for following my updates on this thread, as well as the previous one. I thought that there is too little content regarding the Romanian-speaking space here on fedi overall, hence why I decided to take the matter in my own hands. Do you have any feedback to give me on this? Perhaps you’re just as unsatisfied with the federation issues I have as much as I am. Or just write me any other nice stuff that you want 😀

    If so, I created a form below:

    nc.libranet.de/apps/forms/s/2a…