piefood

Or maybe their candidates shouldn’t support genocide. It’d be much easier to sell the Democrats as a valid party to vote for if they weren’t in support of things like genocide.

No, what got us Trump 2.0 was the Democrats running a shitty candidate, on the coattails of another shitty candidate, on the coattails of a shitty presidential run. People were clamoring for a new candidate that actualy gave a shit, and the Democrats told them to sit down and shut up.

The Democrats chose money, war-mongers, and genocide over winning a slam-dunk election. It’s not the voter’s fault that we’re here, as they loudly told the Democrats what they wanted. It’s the Democrat’s fault for ignoring those demands from their base.

Why should people vote for a party that fights against what they want, when they can vote for a third party that is fighting for what they want?

Link because I don’t think I can upload images on here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FjBAU1OWAAAJB8W?format=jpg&name=medium

I actually have no idea, it just looks like an AI drawing to me. The fact that the glass is answering makes it a bit sus

the AI that generated the image!

8=%=D

or… It could be the Democrats running terrible campaigns with terrible candidates, who ran on the coattails of a terrible president that put us in this situation.

Why are you angry at them, rather than being angry at the candidate that ran a terrible campaign? Or the party that ran a terrible candidate?

I always find it telling when people get mad at those who fight against things like genocide, rather than getting mad at the people who fought for more genocide

If the responsibility is being shelled out to “the algorithm”, then doesn’t that mean they have less responsibility? Shouldn’t they be paid less if they have less responsibility?

Something tells me they won’t see the logic in that though.

https://archive.org/details/CopyingIsNotTheft1080p

I still hate it. Sure, the economy under Trump is worse, but that doesn’t mean the economy under Biden wasn’t also terrible.

One thing that I find useful is that you can do --filesync with an existing zip, which means it only updates the files if the date/size don’t match. This saves a bunch of time on large archives that don’t need to be created from scratch every time.

I have a self-hosted AI system that works pretty well. I can interact with it via my phone, the shell, my IRC server, and I can verbally talk to it.

But I want to get it to remember things, so I need to start working on RAG or something. Eventually I’d like to be able to have it draft emails for me, and schedule appointments.

Ah, nice. I have a similar setup, I have a repo, and for each rc-file, I do:
cat shared/${general_config} ${machine_name}/${machine_specific_config} > ${rc_file_name}

So for spectrwm it does: cat shared/spectrewm.conf laptop/spectrewm.conf > ~/.spectrewm.conf

I’ve looked at i3wm, but I never used it, so I don’t know. If I had to move to another wm, i3wm seems like the first one that I’d look at, since they seem so similar

I’ve been using spectrwm for over a decade https://github.com/conformal/spectrwm and have no plans to change

There’s a fun movie about it: https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/125414-the-final-member

Wouldn’t that be getting rid of the libs?

I think this would be ‘owning’ the libs:
chown -R $(whoami) /usr/lib