Sanitation rules!

Professional shitposter and amateur historian.

  • 2 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 12th, 2025

help-circle


  • Hello. Please be introduced to the concept of poop tomatoes, something that pops up in wastewater plants. In warmer climates we see more poop watermelons.

    It’s not just tomatoes or watermelons but those are the ones that seem to “make it” to being full plants so that’s what people remember. I’d bet on chia for this bad boy.

    Putting some photos behind a spoiler tag because I have no idea what is considered decent vs gross anymore

    spoiler

    Lots of seeds end up in the “grit”. Here is some grit that spilled out of a conveyor.

    Seeds in sludge on a gate in a tank

    Whole ass tomato plants on a gate in an aeration basin. Lots of nutrients and water!






  • Yeah so that exists and it’s not going so well for the UK. I will edit with some links.

    Edit:

    Very broadly water utilities in the UK and north America largely started off private but public ownership is still the norm for centralized system of idk > 100 people?

    Tbh I’m high and not bothering to look stuff but but I’m guessing that it was sewage treatment which lead water utilities (handling both potable and sewage) being public. You can charge people for water, but unless the government is forcing people to connect to a sewer and get rid of pit latrines etc there is no market for it. (Fun fact domestic connections to sewers predate the widespread use of septic tanks)

    Migration to urban centres due to industrialization and the industrial processes themselves were the main loading of sewage, which overwhelmed natural systems that had previously been able to support the community.

    Someone had to treat the sewage because it was fucking up the drinking water. Who has to deal with stuff like that? The government! So they run the sewage plants. And because the private drinking water plants were run for profit and not for health, a lot of them were extremely bad they got shut down. Once again, the government had to step in because they needed to enforce standards.

    Toronto and Ottawa have very interesting and very divergent experiences with that relationship. If someone is interested I can see if I can dig up an article someone wrote about it.

    Anyways, sometimes the government made developers pay directly for the construction, operations and maintenance of a plant, but now in Ontario for the most part they just charge development fees. Small communities like trailer parks or ski villages typically have their own little plant or over glorified septic tank.

    I came here to argue that there are in fact private sewage companies and they are often disasters, but I think the above kind of proved that the origin of public water utilities was the failure of the private sector to get their shit together.

    Well that’s awkward.

    Anyways, fuck Thames Water : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Water



  • The new order comes amid several reported cyberattacks on U.S. water systems, which officials suspect have links to Iran, according to The New York Times.

    I know the article isn’t saying it’s the same, but I wanted to add a clarification that the FBI had said the attacks were only noted in Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), specifically MicroLogix 1100 and 1400 series.

    After remotely accessing internet-facing devices, the actors changed the IP addresses and passwords, resulting in a loss of monitoring and control functionality.

    There have been PLC attacks that resulted from a compromised device being installed but these appear to be about poor security practices.

    Someone is in TROUBLE:

    At least one organization reported modified PLC project files after noticing ladder logic discrepancies across several sites.

    There is literally a physical key you have to turn to change the program. For example:



  • Oh no I’m serious replying to a meme

    Obviously this happens a lot but people get big mad at unions because they think this is happening and it isn’t necessarily.

    The job may be posted internally and externally at the same time. All internal candidates who apply must be assessed first and replied to in order of what union they belong to depending on the job. If can take a long time because people kind of just apply to everything the same way you do as an external candidate.

    Once they are all excluded then HR releases the external applicants for review. At no point are they compared with each other. Not all qualified candidates are contacted because there are probably dozens of them, so maybe the top 5 or so will be invited for the evaluation.

    It’s shitty that there are people who don’t have work, but I get grumpy when people yell NEPOTISM and other things. If we wanted to hire an internal candidate unethically we could and it wouldn’t get posted externally. If we knew there were wrong internal candidates and we were doing things by the book we would post internal only. No one wants to deal with HR to get things posted externally, I promise.


  • I don’t think we are going to see eye to eye on this. We are reading the quotes differently. I’ll try one more time.

    All from this article: https://thecitizen.com/2026/05/14/the-qts-water-story-is-real-its-just-not-about-qts/

    And referencing this letter: https://protectpwc.org/2026/05/05/13786/

    There are actually three meters:

    • 8" domestic, not given a meter number, on Tyrone road.
    • 10" fireline (23006232), highway 54
    • 10" fireline (23006231), Tyrone road

    The letter says the 8" domestic was installed without inspection, and that the fireline on highway 54 was not hooked up to the account and the fire line on Tyrone road was using more water than allowed and therefore a higher rate will be charged. That’s 27.5 MG unbilled and 13.2 million at the ‘wrong’ rate.

    Rapson, Tigert’s boss and the county’s top appointed official, has now told The Citizen on the record that the central claim in that letter is not accurate. County staff did inspect the meter at installation.

    This accounts for the 'illegal hookup". The “central claim” is that there was a meter that was not inspected. This person has indicated that the meter was inspected.

    Tigert herself has hedged her own letter publicly. She told E&E News, the Politico-owned outlet that broke the national story, “I may have hit ‘send’ too soon.” She acknowledged in the same piece that her staff may have known about the hookups, but that she had not been able to locate the inspection report.

    She did not know about the hook up and inspection. She assumed there was no inspection because she could not locate the report.

    I was wrong about the leak audits, I was looking at the wrong line of the reports. I will correct my comments.


  • I can see how you could read it like that but it has been further clarified:

    Rapson, Tigert’s boss and the county’s top appointed official, has now told The Citizen on the record that the central claim in that letter is not accurate. County staff did inspect the meter at installation. Rapson’s exact words were, “It’s not like they put a meter in, threw a camel net over it, and we didn’t know they put the meter in.”

    The same quote, without explicitly stating the meter was inspected, could be ambiguous. Further:

    “Tigert herself has hedged her own letter publicly. She told E&E News, the Politico-owned outlet that broke the national story, “I may have hit ‘send’ too soon.” She acknowledged in the same piece that her staff may have known about the hookups, but that she had not been able to locate the inspection report.”

    The letter was such a mess. You can’t use private fire fighting lines for non fire fighting purposes. It makes no sense the conversation would just be “oh we didn’t bill you”, not “you need to stop.”

    The following section was incorrect, I was looking at the wrong line on the audit spreadsheet.

    (Begin correction)

    The board’s meeting minutes are similarly goofy.

    The person who wrote this has no clue what they are talking about. The cost per unit water doubled because half the water production was unbilled. Their “leakage index” was 7.01 in 2024, up from 3.46 in 2023.

    (End correction)

    YIKES

    They haven’t met since March.

    Tl;dr: the utility clarified there was no unauthorized connection, and wow they are absurdly understaffed I’m not surprised this is such a mess





  • I might also suggest that a public sector dedicated to balancing the resident water demands and industry water-use demands could improve the rate/volume of consumption. But that would require a public voting base / private executive staff that valued the long-term health of the state rather than the short term economic growth of the local neighborhoods.

    I think what most people are missing is that the water consumption was unmetered. Let me put it this way: the water plant knows how much water it’s making at any instant, but there is a huge delay in knowing what the “revenue flow” is. There is always loss in the system between what is produced and what is billed.

    I don’t know this specific system, but if they couldn’t detect the pressure loss without customer complaints, it wasn’t some catastrophic increase in demand. As an example, water main breaks with uncontrolled lost flow are detected in the distribution system when pressure cannot be maintained or local pumping stations are running nonstop to maintain pressure. Low pressure is a safety issue so it gets investigated asap, and increased pumping will probably get flagged as suspicious or at least someone will need to explain why the electric bill is so damn high… Utilities have leak detection tools they can use, and this would have been deployed if there was evidence of a sudden huge increase in demand because the symptoms would have been the same as a leak.

    What is more likely is that the mismatch between production and billed flows was being audited and the local complaints about water pressure was the clue that helped them identify the culprit.

    We can look at water loss reports here: https://epd.georgia.gov/watershed-protection-branch/water-efficiency-and-water-loss-audits

    Their 2024 Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) was 7.02 with a validity score of 71, with the 2023 and 2022 results being 3.46 (70) and 3.37 (66). I’ll bet that lit a fire under some bodies ass!

    Articles on the topic contain statements like:

    “We get this notification from Fayette County water system saying you need to stop watering your lawns to help conserve water,” said James Clifton, an attorney and property rights advocate who obtained and shared the 2025 letter to QTS.

    “So the first thing they do is lean on the individuals and the citizens to stop water consumption when we have QTS that’s just absolutely draining us — most months it’s the No. 1 consumer of water in the county,” said Clifton, who is also running for a seat on the Fayette County Board of Commissioners.

    It really annoys me that this is shared without analysis. The instruction to stop water lawns is entirely unrelated to the data centers water use.

    The systems planning documents show the water sources are sufficient for the projected demand in 2070, but the production capacity (treatment plants) needs to be expanded. Even though there were a lot of losses in 2024, the system was still opening in their capacity. Local pressure losses are a reflection of local bottlenecks, not overall system capacity issues.

    Further, the water conservation is mandated by the Metro North Georgia Water Planning District and their Water Resource Management Plan which:

    requires that Fayette County Water System develop an irrigation pricing schedule that recognizes the impact on peak demand from irrigation.

    These restriction have been in place since at least 2007, according to my tired eyes.

    Anways, I’m not trying to defend the data centre. I’m just annoyed with all the misinformation about this specific case. The root cause is likely administrative.

    While not the case for this specific county, things like non municipal water supply for industries including animal agriculture are a massive risk to water sheds. These water users are subject to far fewer audits and checks, so if they are withdrawing more than permitted they are unlikely to get caught. Water tables drop and municipal supplies are impacted, but again without the means to identify the cause.

    Attention on this specific case and all the misinformation about it is a distraction from other massive water users and their impact.

    ETA: https://thecitizen.com/2026/05/11/behind-fayettes-qts-water-controversy-a-missed-meter-8000-workers-and-a-massive-construction-project/

    Lol, it was a comms failure