It’s a huge failure of computing that this is the most convenient and obvious way to do this.

my man have you ever been in, like, another country?

Idealism? check

False dichotomy between said idealism and cherry picked reality? check

Mistakes avoided by anyone with a mental age over 16.

huh? public school is free

I guess good on you for not having the will to analyze anything beyond the surface level?

LLMs help with coding? In any meaningful way? That’s a great giveaway that you’ve never actually produced and released any real software.

if Lemmy had a tagging system, you’d be “doesn’t know the definition of argument.”

yeah keep arguing against shit no one ever says, top tier discourse my dude

were you trying to be an example on purpose?

* checks post history * oh.

serious question, are you a bit slow?

ah yes, sports. Where everything is fair and equal, and certain individuals don’t have obscene genetic advantages over others.

the divide is too deep. Algorithmic content and garbage education got us here, kumbaya let’s all be friends ain’t getting us out.

nah. they’re dumb. sorry.

yeah that one is kind of funny, but at the end of the day it fits right in the arguments that right wingers can’t make memes-- the joke is cruelty.

Out of curiosity, can you post 1 (one) SINGLE right-wing meme that’s funny?

Did you … stop reading?

The real die-hards don’t think it’s a scheme to create a permanent Democratic majority; they think it’s a plot to ethnically replace white Americans. At its core, the great replacement is about demographics, not democracy.

The article doesn’t try to rebut this because of the staggering number of premises you need to accept before you can even reach such a conclusion. It’s really not worth unpacking here.

You’ll notice I didn’t disagree with the verdict. I just think Kyle is scum and a murderer even if that’s not under the technical legal definitions.

I don’t feel that trying to stop property damage for a family friend’s establishment in the middle of a riot, where police refused to stop people, is a pattern of behavior I want to discourage people from doing.

Really? Letting children be judge, jury, and executioner when it comes to property damage is something your’e totally okay with? I think you have a little bit of growing up to do, buddy.

If you unnecessarily bring a gun somewhere and end up in a situation where you need to use it to kill people, you’re a murderer. I choose to label that murder because I place him in the same category as convicted murderers in my head. He isn’t some dude going about his life and needed to use lethal force in self defense due to unforseen circumstances. He actively sought out the situation, and therefore bears some responsibility. This is more a question of if you want to see his pattern of behavior encouraged or discouraged rather than a question about any individual’s culpability.

Dude, if you have a degree in econ I think your uni should lose its accreditation. I am dead serious.

Removed by mod