This article makes me think I gotta buy some nuclear stocks, but I am hesitant because lemmy might be late on hype cycle. What do you think
This article makes me think I gotta buy some nuclear stocks, but I am hesitant because lemmy might be late on hype cycle. What do you think
In case of math literature, I’d say it is mainly because the equations would be horribly long. Things like integral computation comes with lots of details, or some kind of long exact sequence. Experts would have trouble understanding it, while normal people almost certainly have no interest in understanding the formulae.
Also, often there is no meaning to the variable. Like, in a real function f(x), x is just “a real variable”. There is no additional meaning to it.
As for other fields, I dunno. They might have copied math literature style or something.
It was your comment that made me realize, agtwr a day later. Damn
deleted by creator
Are we ever going to get the answer?
Welp, my head cannot comprehend how that is possible. How is it deforming the shape around?
Maybe I am confusing homotopy and isotopy again.
Hmm, standard embedding to which dimension?
I get you are joking, but I’ve seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
Is it simple? It looks quite complicated, but maybe that’s just me forgetting how to compute forces.
I see, so some battery companies are indeed overpriced…
Do I sit out on the nuclear ralley, hmmm
Would battery companies allow the price to go down? They are quite greedy as well.
Moon at the exact opposite position of Sun? Man, what did minecraft do to us /j
Well, at least until we meet our eventual demise by hyper-abusing our environment, yeah…
Mom, can I have applied category theory?
We have applied category theory at home.
Applied category theory at home: the meme
Counting cohomology has done to me a numbers x_x
Honestly I have trouble dealing with the fact that others (like you) are very eloquent, while I am just a babbling buffoon. It is difficult
True nathematician would never make a mistake distinguishing finite and infinite cardinality. Countability, on the other hand… (but that’s a separate issue)
Do you mean the bean bug?