

deleted by creator
deleted by creator
There is nothing at all being copied but an aesthetic.
Although to me it is interesting that, even without literal copying, a generator might be capable of potentially emulating some key features of a specified source. Can this sometimes arguably extend beyond just “an aesthetic”? We’ve all seen examples similar to this one (from the SD online demo, default setting, with a familiar public-domain source) — https://i.imgur.com/PUJs3RL.png
see also this previous discussion:
https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/182362/What-are-your-backup-solutions
Arguably reddit isn’t even mainstream …
… with just 0.91% of US social media visits this year in March this year, if this isn’t wrong:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/265773/market-share-of-the-most-popular-social-media-websites-in-the-us/
FB 53.09%, Twit 16.25%, IG 13.85%, …, Reddit 0.91% …
[Edited to fix my error.]
[I have no affiliation with the linked site.]
… for years and nobody complained …
FWIW, there was a complaint about Google Books
(long ago resolved). Historical interest only.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc.
deleted by creator