Even if the court says they can’t revoke, the court has no power to stop them.

25’ against what, humans?

I got news for you, birds that get shot are usually more than 25’ away.

They should really issue some sort of identification showing to which quadrant you belong so that friendly quadrants will accept you as a visitor with open arms.

Preposterous!

Finally someone with a science based explanation

Sorry buddy but swim underwater with a deflated balloon and you get a deflated balloon… Not a poopflated kernel.

He was also in the TV show Hoogie Dowser, DDS. That’s where he got his first big break.

But like why did they fill up all plump and not just be like a deflated balloon.

Neil Patrick Darris.

Trolling is a art

For small spaces with limited occupancy, you can get away with opening into the room. Main exits are push, unless it opens onto a public sidewalk and not a stoop or something.

Europeans: haha you guys have no history!

Also Europeans: haha you’re curious where your family emigrated from! Losers!

I’m sure they were mortified they needed to release a proprietary connector

Yes, and you abolish FPTP and now you elect a president how? I’m interested in your proposal, because it’s incomplete to say get rid of FPTP… Otherwise top vote getter, who gets maybe 30% of the vote leads the country which is also an abomination as 70% didn’t vote for that person.

Abolishing FPTP requires doing something else on top of it, ranked choice or run off would be better than the highest count.

Okay so you go with what system?

Let’s say the breakdown of votes looks the same as the Swedish breakdown. There will be more people that voted for a different candidate than the red one (Social Democrat).

This then requires a run off system like france, or a ranked choice, which is also fine to propose, but you can’t hold up a visual of a parliament and say the system is so much better, when we talk about one singular office.

The post compared two things that have different end goals

This fixes congress. How does this fix the presidency, which is one single office?

All they need is 5 SCOTUS justices to agree the text means whatever.

Then you need a different SCOTUS session to disagree or all of that to fix the text

That’s some Sov Cit level legal gymnastics.

“This undocumented immigrant is just travelling, we have no jurisdiction over them”

Figuratively infigurate

So say 100 people work at this company, the other 98 not involved don’t want to listen to you rant and rave either. They might understand, but the more you escalate the less they want to deal with your shit either.