Rodneyck@lemm.ee to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoNew Poster For 28 Years Laterlemm.eeimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up1117arrow-down14
arrow-up1113arrow-down1imageNew Poster For 28 Years Laterlemm.eeRodneyck@lemm.ee to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-squarehitmyspot@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoBoth are inventive and have had more hits than misses. What makes you think this won’t be good?
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 months agoI’ve seen 28 weeks later
minus-squareSkua@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThis one does at least have the writer and director team of Days back, which Weeks did not
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoI’ve also seen Terminator: dark fate
minus-squareMrScottyTay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoFirst ones a classic too. Not seen the others though
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoWeeks is good. There wasn’t a Months. This was supposed to be Months and resolve the cliffhanger from Weeks but it’s been an actual 17 years so…
Both are inventive and have had more hits than misses. What makes you think this won’t be good?
I’ve seen 28 weeks later
This one does at least have the writer and director team of Days back, which Weeks did not
I’ve also seen Terminator: dark fate
First ones a classic too. Not seen the others though
Weeks is good. There wasn’t a Months. This was supposed to be Months and resolve the cliffhanger from Weeks but it’s been an actual 17 years so…