• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So it is a social movement, just not one you agree with. Why? What ideology is it even supposed to be a hollow shell of?

    • Michael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      just not one you agree with. Why?

      No, you misunderstand. I agree with the vast majority of liberal principles, people are just masquerading with its labelling to gatekeep progress.

      I’m more liberal than the most notable liberals. Why? Because the term has been co-opted.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Look I’m going to be honest, I’m pretty confused as to what your point is. You’ve started this by implying my ideology is only ‘mocking people I disagree with’, then now you’re professing you align with the principles of liberal social movements.

        Non-mocking question I swear: Is this because the term ‘liberal’ is often used to describe Democrats (obviously including by themselves)?

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Liberalism is as dead as Latin. Suppose I could speak Latin fluently and knew a few people who also could - it doesn’t make it any more alive.

          Liberalism amounts to vaguely supporting good things while watching democracy and consent-based governance die - and doing absolutely nothing meaningful to change the trajectory. Self-identified liberals blaming/shaming/mocking individuals to the left of them (who are closer ideologically to them than they realize) is what is dividing the left and is an extremely common behavior in online discourse.