article is informing me that it isn’t X - it’s Y

what i got from reading this is that it’s not X, but Y.

One commenter cites von Neumann’s minimax theorem to argue that there is an “inexploitable” strategy for chess, and then another commenter starts talking about the well-ordering theorem.

Of course, all of that is irrelevant because chess is a finite, sequential, perfect-information game.

Well, it is true that computer programs have far surpassed humans in board games. They are very well suited for it. It just has nothing to do with the hypothesized abilities of future “AI” as rationalists conceive them.

The paper is itself written by LLM.

flaviat explained why your counterexample is not correct. But also, the correct statement (Liouville’s theorem) is that a bounded entire function must be constant.

CS has a huge number of people who think you can derive the solutions to social problems from first principles. It’s impossible to reason with them.

Given consistent trends of exponential performance improvements over many years and across many industries, it would be extremely surprising if these improvements suddenly stopped.

I have a Petri dish to sell you