Hours before ProPublica revealed new details about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomasā€™ relationship with the Koch network, a group of Democratic senators filed a brief on Thursday warning that Koch-backed entities are closely involved in an upcoming case that could further gut the federal governmentā€™s regulatory powerā€”and enhance the strength of the conservative-dominated high court.

The case in question is Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which stems from a New Jersey-based fishing companyā€™s challenge to a law requiring certain fishing boats to carry federal compliance monitors to enforce regulations.

Loper Bright Enterprises specifically objected to an interpretation of federal law by the National Marine Fisheries Service, which said the Magnuson-Stevens Act allows the agency to require industry to pay the costs of the monitors.

The dispute over an obscure federal statute has since exploded into a matter of great interest to industry groups and environmentalists, with the latter warning that if the Supreme Court sides with the plaintiffs, it will be much more difficult for federal agencies to implement climate regulations.

Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) echoed that concern and spotlighted the attention the case has attracted from right-wing and corporate-funded groups.

ā€œThis case is the product of a decades-long effort by pro-corporate interests to eviscerate the federal governmentā€™s regulatory apparatus, to the detriment of the American people,ā€ the lawmakers wrote, noting that a number of groups connected to the Koch network and other powerful right-wing organizations have submitted briefs in support of the plaintiffs in Loper v. Raimondo.

ā€œFor example, amici The Buckeye Institute, Cato Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Landmark Legal Foundation, Mountain States Legal Foundation, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, New Civil Liberties Alliance, and Pacific Legal Foundation have all received hundreds of thousands, and sometimes millions, of dollars from Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fundā€”two donor-advised funds that allow ultra-wealthy interests to direct funding anonymously.ā€

ā€œThe Buckeye Institute, Cato Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance, and Pacific Legal Foundation have also received substantial funding from the Koch family foundationsā€”another top-ten funder for the climate change counter-movement,ā€ the senators added.

At the center of Loper v. Raimondo is the so-called Chevron doctrine, a decades-old administrative law principle that says courts should defer to a federal agencyā€™s ā€œreasonableā€ interpretation of a statute when the lawā€™s language is ambiguous.

The plaintiffs in the case and their corporate-backed supporters have called on the Supreme Court to either weaken the Chevron doctrine or overrule it entirely.

In its amicus brief in the case, the Cato Instituteā€”which was co-founded by billionaire oil tycoon Charles Kochā€”declares that the Chevron doctrine is ā€œunconstitutional and ahistoricalā€ and has ā€œwreaked havoc in the lower courts upon people and businesses.ā€

The Democratic senators counter in their brief that the Chevron doctrine has been critical in ā€œallowing Congress to rely on agency capacity and subject-matter expertise to help carry out Congressā€™ broad policy objectives.ā€

ā€œAdministrative regulations reined in dangerous industry activities,ā€ the senators added, ā€œand our society became safer and more prosperous.ā€

A ruling that effectively casts the principle aside, the lawmakers argued, ā€œwould not just conflict with Congressā€™ well-established policymaking desires; it would erode the separation of powers by shifting policymaking power from Congress and the executive to the unaccountable judiciary.ā€

The brief was submitted a day before ProPublica reported that Thomas, one of the justices poised to rule on Loper v. Raimondo, has attended at least two donor events for the Koch network during his time on the Supreme Court.

ProPublica noted that Thomas used to support the Chevron doctrine but has changed his position in recent years amid a growing corporate onslaught against the regulatory principle.

The Democratic senators stressed in their brief that ā€œthe assault in this case on the regulatory system is not an isolated effort.ā€

"For years, regulated interests have funded a full-scale campaign to delegitimize and dismantle federal regulations,ā€ the lawmakers wrote. ā€œThe court should proceed cautiously before contributing to their sought-for degradation of our American regulatory system.ā€

    • WagesOf@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      You should get some rich homies, theyā€™re really useful for doing crimes and being corrupt.

  • matchphoenix@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    ProPublica noted that Thomas used to support the Chevron doctrine but has changed his position in recent years amid a growing corporate onslaught against the regulatory principle.

    Thomas is completely bought and paid for

  • Binthinkin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Well duh. This has been known for 50 years at least. Capitalists hate regulation and being responsible. Theyā€™re actual tyrants. They never were your friends and neither are their products and you should get your infrastructure back from them too.