• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ignores all the policy announcements Kamala made, complains that there aren’t any policies.

    But yes, actually, being not Trump is an excellent reason to vote for Kamala, because there are only two possible outcomes of this election, and one of them is a wannabe dictator, KKK-supporting, idiot putin stooge, racist, hate-filled, selfish, duplicitous, personally disloyal, insurrectionist, unamerican, country betraying, diaper-wearing emotional crybaby thrower of money at the already super-rich, and frankly I’m tired of people pretending that he doesn’t desperately need keeping out of the White House.

    • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      there are only two possible outcomes of this election

      And there’s the problem with all these responses in a nutshell. Shortsightedness.

      Yes, there’s only two possible outcomes to this election, and yes Kamala is the better candidate by miles. But your voting actions don’t only affect this election, they affect all future elections. They’re the background against which all political strategy is determined.

      If you just bend over every time you’re threatened with four years of some fuckwit in office, then you’ve committed to a political system where your opinion on policy ceases to be relevant. All that’s required for a complete autocracy is for one party to be a unbearable fascist and then the other party doesn’t even have to consider what the electorate actually think because they’re the not-fascists, and that’s all that’s needed.

      And this isn’t even slippery-slope. It’s happening right now. The not-fascists are actually complicit in war crimes and are still getting your vote . How much worse will it be in four year’s time after they’ve had it proven to work? Why would they ever listen to the electorate on anything ever again?

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yes, there are just two outcomes. If Trump wins, the Democrats will again move to the right to occupy what passes for the centre ground in American politics. Kamala is one of the most pro worker candidates they’ve had in my lifetime. If they lose against the most incompetently bad president the country had in my lifetime with the most left candidate they’ve had in decades, they will pivot back to the “centre”.

        • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          So if they loose because leftists don’t like their policies enough to vote for them, they’ll pivot right? What would be the logic behind such a decision?

          There’s thousands of leftist votes available, all they have to do to access them is produce a more left-wing agenda (like, say, not being complicit in war crimes).

          But you’re suggesting in response to this loss (as a result of not denouncing war crimes) they’ll not, you know, denounce war crimes next time, but rather shift even more into the ground that’s in direct competition with their only opponent and try to win die hard Republicans who’d vote a Big Mac into government if it wore a MAGA cap?

          Can you explain what you think their rationale would be for such a move?

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            They’ll lose because some fatally online “leftists” can’t bring themselves to vote democrat no matter how bad the alternative is and they’ll pivot right because they have some hope of winning over centrists, and the right wing politicians are the ones who are winning and the supposedly left wing ones get 1% of the popular vote and zero members into the electoral college. It’s America after all.

            • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Oh and this…

              They’ll lose because some fatally online “leftists” can’t bring themselves to vote democrat no matter how bad the alternative is

              … is a disgrace.

              They work for us. They chase our vote. That’s how democracy works. We don’t owe them a vote.

              I suggest maybe you stop blaming your fellow man, and defending those in power, and start blaming those in power and defending your fellow man.

              • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                They’ll lose because some fatally online “leftists” can’t bring themselves to vote democrat no matter how bad the alternative is

                … is a disgrace.

                True. You should be ashamed of yourselves. This vote matters. Stop pretending it’s a game. Trump would be a disaster internationally and for American workers.

            • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              they’ll pivot right because they have some hope of winning over centrists

              What makes you think that?

              I’ve already, in a different thread, posted the latest polls showing the majority of Americans want to stop arms sales to Israel. The data suggests stopping arms sales would win a huge number of votes, but it isn’t Democrat policy.

              If the Democrats are likely to shift policy to seek votes, then why haven’t they shifted to banning arms sales to Israel?

              Absent of further data, it doesn’t look at all like Democrat policy follows available votes. It looks more like Democrat policy follows the wishes of their wealthy donors, so unless they tack to the right, I can’t see why Democrat policy will.

              If you want to make a case that Democrat policy chases votes, you’ll have to explain why they’re not chasing the obvious anti-genocide vote?

              • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Sigh. They’d see the republicans win and move right because it’s the right who won. Stupid? Yes. Damaging? Yes. Can you or I change it? No.

                It’s so illogical of you to suggest that losing to the right will shift them left. That’s not how it works. It’s not how it ever works. It’s not even how it works in countries that have more balanced political systems.

                And victory for an incredibly delusionally far right wing president isn’t the left wrong victory you seem to think it would be.

                Stop pretending that if the Democrats lose just one more time, America will suddenly turn communist. It won’t. The route left comes through moving left, not lurching to the right again.

                • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If you read the whole post rather than just the bit of it you think you’ve got a condescending answer to, we might have a more productive conversation.

                  The question was if your claim is that the Democrats have a policy of shifting in the direction of more votes, then why do they not shift in the direction of opposing arms sales to Israel?

                  Your assumption that the Democrats move policy in the direction of more votes (the one you think it’s so “stupid” to not know), is directly contradicted by the evidence that the majority of the country are anti-war and they are not shifting in that direction.

                  Just repeating blind platitudes you read in The Atlantic is not an argument. You have to actually attempt to respond to what your interlocutor is saying.

                  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I didn’t say it was stupid to not know that the Democrats pivot right when they need to gain more votes, I said that it’s stupid and damaging that they do so.

                    But it’s also logical. Sadly, there isn’t a secret leftist majority just waiting in the wings for that one extra well worded announcement from Harris so they can vote in droves and give the Democrats a supermajority up and down the ticket.

                    Unfortunately, it’s America, and elections are won or lost in the song states, so it’ll be decided by a bunch of “centrists” in Pennsylvania who can’t decide which is better, loony right wing Republican policies or more moderate Democrats. If it’s too “communist”, they’re scared of it, but if you can give it some good ol’ American branding like “Help for Heroes”, you can get away with it.

                    These are the centrist votes the Democrats need to win, but if they can win without them, they can afford to be more left wing.

                    The centrist’s both sidesism is as reality denying as your own, but the bad news for you is that there are a lot more of them than of leftists, so the Democrats are only safe from centrist influence of the left wing folk show up and vote for the less right wing option. Your refusal to compromise is exactly how you make it senseless for the Democrats to chase your votes. You were never going to vote for anything short of communism, so you were never going to participate in choosing the president so your opinions cannot ever matter to the Democrats. This is, unless you’re prepared to vote for them sometimes, you know, when the choice is particularly stark and the country stands on the brink of fascism.