• racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d say the issue is that if honey isn’t vegan because you’re causing harm to bees, isn’t most of modern vegetable agriculture at least equally harmful to bees & other insects due to all the pesticides being used?

    Or is it just if we directly involve bees, it’s bad, but if we inflict greater harm in a less direct way, it’s acceptable?

    • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Every aspect of our globalised and industrialised world is causing harm. Veganism is about reducing the harm we’re responsible for as far as possible and reasonable. Renouncing honey is easy. So it’s possible and reasonable. No vegan thinks they’re responsible for zero suffering or even zero dead animals, we’re simply trying to reduce the number as best as we can without starving ourselves.

      • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        But if honey is cultivated in a way that’s better for the bees than other sources of sugar, wouldn’t using honey be more logical for vegans?

        • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          In a perfect world I think this could be true. Small scale backyard beekeeping with native species, where I only take the surplus the bees themselves don’t use, where queens are left alone and drones are allowed to reproduce in their own pace. The problem is: That’s not how it’s done on the industrial scale at all. So even if you had such a bee utopia in your backyard and could replace all your sugary needs with that, as long as the well being of bees is of interest to you you’d probably still refrain from buying products that have honey in them. In a capitalist society companies will always use the cheaper stuff, and that comes almost exclusively with massive animal exploitation.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That argument does hold water but it would never provide enough honey for the market. It would necessarily require a vast reduction in the demand for honey to allow sustainably sourced honey to meet that demand.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      isn’t most of modern vegetable agriculture at least equally harmful

      I’m a going with far more harmful.

      • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah. The modern method of acres and acres of one species being farmed, with or without pesticides and other performance enhancing drugs is terrible for the environment.

        For many animals, you might as well build an asphalt parking lot for each acre of corn or soy you plant. Same goes for Western grass lawns.

        The critters that can’t adapt starve or move away.

    • CetaceanNeeded@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not just insects. Vermin control is critical and often not very ethical. Here in Australia, rabbits and kangaroos can be a big issue for farmers too and are often killed to protect crops when they become too numerous. Ducks can be a big issue for rice farmers here and permits are issued to shoot ducks on crops.