ora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agoThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down19
arrow-up1125arrow-down1imageThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squarehakase@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 days agoIt’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
minus-squareReptilianCleric@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 days agoI would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.
It’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
∞ ↑↑↑↑↑… ↑↑↑∞
Fair enough
I would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.