• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe we shouldn’t worry about their eligibility to vote, but us allowing them to live in such a toxic information environment.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Things like toxic information environment are often defined by those who are in control and monetary interests. People inherently have biases in almost everything they do and what they spend their money on. If you want to get rid of these biases and misinformation, you pretty much have to do away with money entirely.

      Since that likely will never happen, I think it is upon voters… especially Democrats, to not demonize everyone. People might not remember every policy of a previous President, but they sure as hell remember when they are attacked nonstop. Heck, they may even “forget” some things about who they might be voting for because subconsciously they don’t want to remember the trauma for being attacked when they legitimately didn’t know.

      I’m not saying you’re advocating for censorship, but I want to be clear that I don’t think it is a good idea to have a single authority telling you what you should and shouldn’t trust. The MSM already tried that and it failed miserably this election.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        We can take basic protections. Hyper engagement optimization should be illegal because it makes hate and bait float to the top, and there’s nothing “biased” about that. Even tech giants would probably swallow it, as their competition would be on a level playing field.