• WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      But that is the explicit threat. That is what law makers are saying they are setting as precedent.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          There’s no guarantee they will be charged is not the same as there is a guarantee they will not be charged. And that is the issue, the hospitals were directly threatened by republicans with jail time, and contradictory statements, as proof when she reached out to get clarification from the governor even he noped out when it mattered. Also remember that the doctors do not run the hospital, administrators and bean counters do.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              There only has to be the threat. Because as long as hospitals are afraid to perform abortions the republicans win… well “win” in this case. We are just people arguing could have should have, when the hospital doctors recommended it, but the hospital with their lawyers and the fact they have been doing this as a profession was not as convinced as you seem to be.

              Besides, is your argument the hospital was out to kill this lady specifically?