• spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    i don’t think you know what aneurism-posting means.

    in reality it’s not well received because this style of humor just doesn’t hit the 196 community the same as in other internet spaces i frequent. 196 and diana have a lot in common, particularly with the cities skyline crowd, but i tried to diversify my posting to a probably much older and out of the loop audience which is not sensitive of the memetic value here.

    i tried a diversification to my posting and the material didn’t land in this context. no need to insult 🤷‍♀️

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      i thought aneurysm posting was when someone is trying to say something salient but autocorrect and typographical errors have merged in the worst possible way to make it absolutely unintelligible.

      (so it reads like they’re having an aneurysm)

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        that’s exactly what i have always understood as well, thanks for sharing your experience i was getting confused

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        My understanding is that anuerysm posting is when, even if you account for spelling mistakes and auto correct errors, the text is still indecipherable, as if the person has dysphasia, or is actively having an anuerysm, resulting in grammaticaly unparseable, meaningless sentences, where no salient ‘objective’ of the utterance can be determined.

        (Different from schizo posting, where the sentences usually are mostly parseable as having actual meaning, its just that whats being said is completely insane.)